The role of methylation of DNA in environmental adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Methylation of DNA is an epigenetic mechanism that influences patterns of gene expression. DNA methylation marks contribute to adaptive phenotypic variation but are erased during development. The role of DNA methylation in adaptive evolution is therefore unclear. We propose that environmentally-induced DNA methylation causes phenotypic heterogeneity that provides a substrate for selection via forces that act on the epigenetic machinery. For example, selection can alter environmentally-induced methylation of DNA by acting on the molecular mechanisms used for the genomic targeting of DNA methylation. Another possibility is that specific methylation marks that are environmentally-induced, yet non-heritable, could influence preferential survival and lead to consistent methylation of the same genomic regions over time. As methylation of DNA is known to increase the likelihood of cytosine-to-thymine transitions, non-heritable adaptive methylation marks can drive an increased likelihood of mutations targeted to regions that are consistently marked across several generations. Some of these mutations could capture, genetically, the phenotypic advantage of the epigenetic mark. Thereby, selectively favored transitory alterations in the genome invoked by DNA methylation could ultimately become selectable genetic variation through mutation. We provide evidence for these concepts using examples from different taxa, but focus on experimental data on large-scale DNA sequencing that expose between-group genetic variation after bidirectional selection on honeybees, Apis mellifera.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DNA methylation is involved in phenotypic inheritance in single-celled organisms, as well as in transgenerational inheritance in multicellular organisms.
“DNA methylation is involved in phenotypic inheritance in single-celled organisms, as well as in transgenerational inheritance in multicellular organisms.”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
The section “Evidence for transgenerational inheritance of DNA methylation” describes methylation-dependent inherited stress responses in plants, supporting the multicellular-organism part of the claim. The passages found do not address phenotypic inheritance in single-celled organisms, so that part is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a mammalian genome, the distribution of CpG dinucleotides is random, exhibiting regions of low and high density, known as CpG islands.
“In a mammalian genome, the distribution of CpG dinucleotides is random, exhibiting regions of low and high density, known as CpG islands [52].”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
The ‘DNA methylation increases mutability’ section reports patterns of CpG depletion at genomic loci, including in humans, which supports variation in CpG density. Our copy does not say that CpGs are randomly distributed in mammalian genomes or identify high-density regions as CpG islands; searches for those terms found no such passage. No page number was provided for the passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe potential capacity to generate novel routes with DNA methylation, due to environmental variation, for phenotypic diversity is tightly linked with DNA methylation in adaptive evolution.
“The potential capacity to generate novel routes with DNA methylation, due to environmental variation, for phenotypic diversity is tightly linked with DNA methylation in adaptive evolution [52].”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
BRCA1 and USP44 have been reported to be of great interest in breast cancer, since BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor and USP44 still has unknown oncogenic potential.
“For instance, BRCA1 and USP44 have been reported to be of great interest in breast cancer, since the first protein is a tumor suppressor, and the second one still has an unknown oncogenic potential.”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
The passages from “The genomic functional roles of DNA methylation” and “Remarks and future work” discuss methylation and environmental adaptation, not the roles of BRCA1 or USP44 in breast cancer. Searches for both proteins and USP44’s oncogenic potential found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984 · see citing works
Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms
Cedar, H., & Bergman, Y. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2540 · Cited by 2,267 · see citing works
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963 · see citing works
Bartolomei, M. S., & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a002592 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15]15. Mousseau TA, Fox CW. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- [38]38. Sved J, Bird A. 1990. The expected equilibrium of the CpG dinucleotide in vertebrate genomes under a mutation model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:4692-6. - Verhoeven KJF, Jansen JJ, Van Dijk PJ, Biere A. 2010. Stressinduced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol 185:1108-18. - Waibel M, Floreano D, Magnenat S, Keller L. 2006. Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations. Proc Biol Sci 273:1815-23. - Wassenegger M, Heimes S, Riedel L, Sa ¨nger HL. 1994. RNAdirected de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell 76:567-76. - Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ. 2004. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 7:847-54. - West-Eberhard MJ. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Wolff GL, Kodell RL, Moore SR, Cooney CA. 1998. Maternal epigenetics and methyl supplements affect agouti gene expression in Avy/a mice. FASEB J 12:949-57. - Wu L, Zhou H, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Ni F, Liu C, Qi Y. 2010. DNA methylation mediated by a microRNA pathway. Mol Cell 38:465-75. - Xiao W, Custard KD, Brown RC, Lemmon BE, Harada JJ, Goldberg RB, Fischer RL. 2006. DNA methylation is critical for Arabidopsis embryogenesis and seed viability. Plant Cell 18:805-14. - Youngson NA, Whitelaw E. 2008. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:233-57. - Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A, Cokus S, Chan SW-L, Chen H, Henderson IR, Shinn P, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE, et al. 2006. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 126:1189-201. - Zhu J-K. 2009. Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu Rev Genet 43:143-66. - Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S. 2007. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat Genet 39:61-9.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications
Meza-Menchaca, T., Albores-Medina, A., Heredia-Mendez, A. J., Ruíz-May, E., Ricaño-Rodríguez, J., Gallegos-García, V., Esquivel, A., Vettoretti-Maldonado, G., & Campos-Parra, A. D. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25147927 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Flores, K. B., Wolschin, F., & Amdam, G. V.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Flores, K. B.
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-04-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 359-372
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- PMC
- PMC3710460
- OpenAlex
- W2111245109
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG022500, P01/AG/22500)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- DNA methylation, epigenetics, environmental adaptation, adaptive evolution, phenotypic heterogeneity, Apis mellifera, bidirectional selection, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Base Sequence, Bees, Environment, Mutation, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Evolution, Molecular, DNA Methylation, Genome, Insect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review