The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dynamics of Organizational Status
Abstract
This paper examines the growth (and decline) of organizational status. It is argued that an organization's status is determined by two factors: past performance outcomes and the status of the organization's affiliates. The better the past performance outcomes and the higher the status of the affiliates, the greater the organization's growth in status. This basic proposition is tested in an examination of status changes among investment banks in the non-investment grade market between 1981 and 1987. Implications and extensions are discussed in the conclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.274 · Cited by 2,926
Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666998 · Cited by 2,751
Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market
Podolny, J. M. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/323038 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationThe Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry
Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0175 · Cited by 743
Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology
Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503 · Cited by 470
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PODOLNY, J. M., & PHILLIPS, D. J.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 453-471
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W1975145901
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dynamics of Organizational Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icc/5.2.453
- The paper
- PODOLNY, J. M., & PHILLIPS, D. J. (1996). The Dynamics of Organizational Status. Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.2.453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
