The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology
Abstract
Status has become an increasingly influential concept in the fields of organizational and economic sociology during the past two decades. Research in this area has not only helped explain behavior within and between organizations, but has also contributed to our understanding of status processes more generally. In this review, we point to the contributions of this field in terms of the determinants of status, the effects of status, and the mechanisms by which these effects are produced. We next appraise the way in which a network approach has contributed to our formal understanding of status positions and status hierarchies. We then highlight recent studies that demonstrate the value of studying the structures of status hierarchies themselves rather than focusing solely on the actors within them. After suggesting potential directions for future research, we conclude by calling for renewed efforts to translate concepts and theories across levels of analysis and substantive commitment in order to build more general theories of status processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n575 · Cited by 6,008
WHAT'S IN A NAME? REPUTATION BUILDING AND CORPORATE STRATEGY.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256324 · Cited by 5,411
Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures
Bonacich, P. (1987) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228631 · Cited by 5,165
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Latour, B. (1987) · Cited by 4,106
Cited by
Why Status Matters for Inequality
Ridgeway, C. L. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413515997 · Cited by 965
How Rankings Produce Competition: The Case of Global University Rankings
Brankovic, J., Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2018-0118 · Cited by 223
Burt, R. S., & Merluzzi, J. (2016) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2015.0108 · Cited by 177
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review
Teplitskiy, M., Acuna, D., Elamrani-Raoult, A., Körding, K., & Evans, J. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.014 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-08-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-283
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2114759906
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 13.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503
- The paper
- Sauder, M., Lynn, F., & Podolny, J. M. (2012). Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.