Cited by 53Medical Coding and Health InformationHealthcare Systems and Public HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Death Certificate Coding Practices Related to Diabetes in European Countries—The ‘EURODIAB Subarea C’ Study

JOUGLA, ERIC, PAPOZ, LAURE, BALKAU, BEVERLEY, MAGUIN, PAULETTE, HATTON, FRANCOISE·1992·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare and analyse coding practices for diabetes mortality data in nine European countries (Belgium, Republic of Ireland, France, Germany, Malta, The Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland). In each country, a sample of 200 coded death certificates, which mentioned diabetes, was randomly sampled. All death certificates were recoded at the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Classification of Diseases in the French language. The results show wide differences between national coding and central coding. Discrepancies in the underlying cause of death existed at the 3-digit coding level for 26% of all death certificates and for 44% at the 4-digit level. Coding in Northern Ireland and Malta was characterized by a marked tendency to choose diabetes less frequently. In contrast, in The Netherlands and, to a lesser extent, in the Republic of Ireland and France, diabetes was more frequently selected as the underlying cause of death. Most of the differences concerned the coding of an association involving diabetes and circulatory system diseases. In some countries, these coding differences influence the reported level of diabetes mortality. For Northern Ireland and Malta, the number of certificates with diabetes as the underlying cause of death was more than doubled after central recoding and for The Netherlands, in contrast, it was almost halved. To explain the differences a number of factors are considered: a lack of information from t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/21.2.343

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JOUGLA, E., PAPOZ, L., BALKAU, B., MAGUIN, P., & HATTON, F.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1992
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
343-351
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2030659334
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mortality, death certificate coding, underlying cause of death, ICD-10, international comparability, circulatory diseases
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Data Collection, Death Certificates, Diabetes Mellitus, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, World Health Organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review