Death Certificate Coding Practices Related to Diabetes in European Countries—The ‘EURODIAB Subarea C’ Study
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare and analyse coding practices for diabetes mortality data in nine European countries (Belgium, Republic of Ireland, France, Germany, Malta, The Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland). In each country, a sample of 200 coded death certificates, which mentioned diabetes, was randomly sampled. All death certificates were recoded at the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Classification of Diseases in the French language. The results show wide differences between national coding and central coding. Discrepancies in the underlying cause of death existed at the 3-digit coding level for 26% of all death certificates and for 44% at the 4-digit level. Coding in Northern Ireland and Malta was characterized by a marked tendency to choose diabetes less frequently. In contrast, in The Netherlands and, to a lesser extent, in the Republic of Ireland and France, diabetes was more frequently selected as the underlying cause of death. Most of the differences concerned the coding of an association involving diabetes and circulatory system diseases. In some countries, these coding differences influence the reported level of diabetes mortality. For Northern Ireland and Malta, the number of certificates with diabetes as the underlying cause of death was more than doubled after central recoding and for The Netherlands, in contrast, it was almost halved. To explain the differences a number of factors are considered: a lack of information from t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ICD coding practices documenting the underlying cause of death can vary.
“Other limitations of our study include, first, that ICD coding practices documenting the underlying cause of death can vary.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ong, K. L., Stafford, L. K., McLaughlin, S. A., Boyko, E. J., Vollset, S. E., Smith, A. E., Dalton, B. E., Duprey, J., Cruz, J. A., Hagins, H., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01301-6 · Cited by 4,681 · see citing works
D'Amico, M., Agozzino, E., Biagino, A., Simonetti, A., & Marinelli, P. (1999) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1023/a:1007570405888 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Improving the comparability of diabetes mortality statistics in the U.S. and Mexico.
Murray, C. J. L., Dias, R. H., Kulkarni, S. C., Lozano, R., Stevens, G. A., & Ezzati, M. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1370 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- JOUGLA, E., PAPOZ, L., BALKAU, B., MAGUIN, P., & HATTON, F.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- ORCID
- BALKAU, BEVERLEY
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 343-351
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2030659334
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- diabetes mortality, death certificate coding, underlying cause of death, ICD-10, international comparability, circulatory diseases
- MeSH terms
- Cause of Death, Data Collection, Death Certificates, Diabetes Mellitus, Europe, Humans, International Cooperation, World Health Organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review