Cited by 44Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealthcare Systems and Public HealthMedical Coding and Health Information

Improving the comparability of diabetes mortality statistics in the U.S. and Mexico.

Murray, Christopher J.L., Dias, Rodrigo H., Kulkarni, Sandeep C., Lozano, Rafael, Stevens, Gretchen A., Ezzati, Majid·2008·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to increase the cross-state comparability of diabetes mortality statistics related in the U.S. and Mexico. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate the effects of individual and community factors on a death for which diabetes was recorded as one of the multiple contributing causes of death (MCD) being assigned to diabetes as the underlying cause of death (UCD) versus assignment to cardiovascular, other noncommunicable, or communicable diseases. We used the model to estimate state-level diabetes death rates that are standardized in the individual and community factors. RESULTS—Deaths with diabetes as one of the MCD were more likely to be assigned to cardiovascular causes as the UCD if they occurred in hospitals or if an autopsy was performed and if the decedents were from states with higher BMI and systolic blood pressure, were more educated, or had insurance. Adjusting for individual- and community-level factors substantially increased the cross-state correlation of diabetes as the UCD and diabetes as one of the MCD mortality rates. The adjustment also reduced the number of direct diabetes deaths by 10% in the U.S. and by 24% in Mexico. In the U.S., deaths with diabetes as the UCD declined most in Utah, New Mexico, New Jersey, and Louisiana and increased in California and Hawaii. In Mexico, the numbers of adjusted diabetes deaths were smaller than those observed in all states by 3–34%. An additional 126,300 deaths due to ischemic heart disease and stroke in the U.S. and 19,497 in Mexico were attributable to high blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS—There is a need to improve the comparability of diabetes cause-of-death assignment, especially in relation to cardiovascular diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc07-1370

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C. J. L., Dias, R. H., Kulkarni, S. C., Lozano, R., Stevens, G. A., & Ezzati, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Secretaria de Salud (MX)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
451-458
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1975772564
Cited by
44
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
diabetes mortality, cause of death assignment, underlying cause of death, international comparability, United States, Mexico, ischemic heart disease, stroke, hyperglycemia, hospitalization, autopsy, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, educational attainment, health insurance
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Mexico, Mortality, Regression Analysis, United States, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review