The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and Sex-Ratio of the Subtypes of Migraine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide the prevalence and sex-ratio of subtypes of migraine diagnosed by neurological interview according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. METHODS: In all, 3000 males and 1000 females aged 40 years were randomly selected from the Danish population. They received a mailed questionnaire regarding migraine. The questionnaire response rate was 87%. People with self-reported migraine and a random sample of those reporting no migraine were invited to a headache interview, and a physical and a neurological examination. Those not reacting to the invitation were interviewed by telephone. Participation at the interview was 87%. Kappa was 0.77 validating self-reported migraine in the questionnaire against the diagnosis of the clinical interview. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalences of migraine without aura, migraine with aura, migraine aura without headache, and migrainous disorder were 8%, 4%, 1% and 1% in males and 16%, 7%, 3% and 2% in females. Overall lifetime prevalence of any type of migraine was 18%; 12% in males and 24% in females. This is lower than the sum of the prevalences since migraine diagnoses are not mutually exclusive. The male:female ratios of migraine without aura, migraine with aura, migraine aura without headache, and migrainous disorder were approximately 1:2. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine is more prevalent than previously thought. There was a significant preponderance in females of all the subtypes of migraine except migrainous disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide
Stovner, L., Hagen, K., Jensen, R., Katsarava, Z., Lipton, R., Scher, A., Steiner, T., & Zwart, J.-A. (2007) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x · Cited by 2,444
How common are the "common" neurologic disorders?
Hirtz, D., Thurman, D. J., Gwinn-Hardy, K., Mohamed, M., Chaudhuri, A. R., & Zalutsky, R. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252807.38124.a3 · Cited by 1,365
Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Edition
International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, Tfelt-Hansen, P., Block, G., Dahlöf, C., Diener, H.-C., Ferrari, M., Goadsby, P., Guidetti, V, Jones, B., Lipton, R., et al. (2000) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x · Cited by 698
Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project
Stovner, L. J., & Andree, C. (2010) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1007/s10194-010-0217-0 · Cited by 580
Epidemiology of headache in Europe
Stovner, L. J., Zwart, J. ‐., Hagen, K., Terwindt, G. M., & Pascual, J. (2006) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01184.x · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- RUSSELL, M. B., RASMUSSEN, B. K., THORVALDSEN, P., & OLESEN, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 612-618
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2155724567
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Sex-Ratio of the Subtypes of Migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/24.3.612
- The paper
- RUSSELL, M. B., RASMUSSEN, B. K., THORVALDSEN, P., & OLESEN, J. (1995). Prevalence and Sex-Ratio of the Subtypes of Migraine. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.3.612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.