The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A self-administered food frequency questionnaire was developed for the Dutch cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Habitual consumption of 178 food items can be calculated from the questionnaire data. METHODS: Reproducibility and relative validity for food group intake were investigated in a population of 121 Dutch men and Women. The questionnaire was administered three times at 6-month intervals in order to determine the reproducibility. To assess the relative validity 12 monthly 24-hour recalls served as the reference method. RESULTS: Spearman rank order correlation coefficients between estimates of food group intake assessed by repeated questionnaires ranged from 0.45 to 0.92. For men, Spearman correlation coefficients between estimates of food group intake based on the questionnaire and those based on 24-hour recalls ranged from 0.21 for cooked vegetables to 0.78 for sugar and sweet products, with a range of 0.61. For women the median was 0.53, with a minimum of 0.31 for vegetables and a maximum of 0.87 for alcoholic beverages. The photographs in the questionnaire for the estimation of portion sizes contributed little to the relative validity of the ranking of subjects. However, on the group level most median food group estimates based on photographic portion sizes were closer to the median intakes as assessed by 24-hour recalls than those based on standard portion sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire seems adequate for ranking Dutch EPIC subjects according to intake of most food groups, although the relative validity for some food groups, such as vegetables and fish, remains of concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hosseini Esfahani, F., Asghari, G., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2010) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.2188/jea.je20090083 · Cited by 880
Endogenous sex hormones and metabolic syndrome in aging men
Muller, M., Grobbee, D. E., den Tonkelaar, I., Lamberts, S. W. J., & van der Schouw, Y. T. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1158 · Cited by 456
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: Effects on prevalence estimates and associations
Van Loon, A. (2003) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(02)00257-0 · Cited by 423
Johansson, I., Hallmans, G., Wikman, Å., Biessy, C., Riboli, E., & Kaaks, R. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001315 · Cited by 366
Endogenous sex hormones in men aged 40-80 years
Muller, M., den Tonkelaar, I., Thijssen, J., Grobbee, D., & van der Schouw, Y. (2003) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje.0.1490583 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Ocke, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 90001
- Pages
- 37S-48
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2126549706
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s37
- The paper
- Ocke, M. (1997). The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.