Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India

Mazumder, Debendra N Guha, Haque, Reina, Ghosh, Nilima, De, Binay K, Santra, Amal, Chakraborti, Dipankar, Smith, Allan H·2000·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large population in West Bengal, India has been exposed to naturally occurring inorganic arsenic through their drinking water. A cross-sectional survey involving 7683 participants of all ages was conducted in an arsenic-affected region between April 1995 and March 1996. The main focus of the study was skin keratoses and pigmentation alterations, two characteristic signs of ingested inorganic arsenic. Strong exposure-response gradients were found for these skin lesions. The study also collected limited information concerning respiratory system signs and symptoms, which we report here because increasing evidence suggests that arsenic ingestion also causes pulmonary effects. METHODS: Participants were clinically examined and interviewed, and the arsenic content in their current primary drinking water source was measured. There were few smokers and analyses were confined to non-smokers (N = 6864 participants). RESULTS: Among both males and females, the prevalence of cough, shortness of breath, and chest sounds (crepitations and/or rhonchi) in the lungs rose with increasing arsenic concentrations in drinking water. These respiratory effects were most pronounced in individuals with high arsenic water concentrations who also had skin lesions. Prevalence odds ratio (POR) estimates were markedly increased for participants with arsenic-induced skin lesions who also had high levels of arsenic in their current drinking water source (> or = 500 microg/l) compared with individuals who had normal skin and were exposed to low levels of arsenic (<50 microg/l). In participants with skin lesions, the age-adjusted POR estimates for cough were 7.8 for females (95% CI : 3.1-19.5) and 5.0 for males (95% CI : 2.6-9.9); for chest sounds POR for females was 9.6 (95% CI : 4.0-22.9) and for males 6.9 (95% CI : 3.1-15.0). The POR for shortness of breath in females was 23.2 (95% CI : 5.8-92.8) and in males 3.7 (95% CI : 1.3-10.6). CONCLUSION: These results add to evidence that long-term ingestion of inorganic arsenic can cause respiratory effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/29.6.1047

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Mazumder, D. N. G., Haque, R., Ghosh, N., De, B. K., Santra, A., Chakraborti, D., & Smith, A. H.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2000-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1047-1052
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2113798600
Cited by
328
References
0
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/29.6.1047
The paper
Mazumder, D. N. G., Haque, R., Ghosh, N., De, B. K., Santra, A., Chakraborti, D., & Smith, A. H. (2000). Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.6.1047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.