Cited by 145Homicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence ResearchCrime Patterns and Interventions

Understanding the uneven distribution of the incidence of homicide in Latin America

Briceno-Leon, R., Villaveces, A., Concha-Eastman, A.·2008·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Throughout the final years of the twentieth century and into the beginning of the twenty-first, violence has been one of the main public health issues in Latin America, a region which has some of the highest mortality rates due to violence in the world. However, there seems to be an uneven geographical distribution of such instances. METHODS: We reviewed epidemiological data on violence globally and in Latin America, and here, we discuss differences between the Latin American countries in the context of a sociological framework as well as from a public health perspective. RESULTS: Our results indicate marked differences by country in terms of rates of violence. Countries such as Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, and Uruguay, have low violence mortality rates; Peru, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Panama, and Paraguay have moderate rates, and Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras and Venezuela have high to extremely high mortality rates. Factors related to violence include social inequalities, lack of employment opportunities, urban segregation, a culture of masculinity, local drug markets, and the availability of firearms and widespread use of alcohol. CONCLUSION: The observed homicide variability between Latin American countries can be explained largely by differences in the countries' social contexts and political models. In those countries where homicide rates are extremely high, governments should review their current policies and take preventive actions. Fortunately increasingly nowadays there are promising advancements in that direction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyn153

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briceno-Leon, R., Villaveces, A., & Concha-Eastman, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Central de Venezuela (VE)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
Corresponding author
Briceno-Leon, R.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-07-23
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
751-757
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2103302101
Cited by
145
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R49-CCR402444)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
homicide, violence, Latin America, social inequality, masculinity, urban segregation, drug market, alcohol consumption, violence prevention, political models
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Culture, Developing Countries, Homicide, Humans, Latin America, Politics, Population Dynamics, Public Health, Social Class, Unemployment, Urbanization, Incidence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review