Cited by 69Nutritional Studies and DietHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Meat intake and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in two large US prospective cohorts of women and men

Open access
Ma, Yanan, Yang, Wanshui, Li, Tricia, Liu, Yue, Simon, Tracey G, Sui, Jing, Wu, Kana, Giovannucci, Edward L +2 more·2019·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence on the associations between meat intake and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited and inconsistent. METHODS: We prospectively examined the association between consumption of meats and meat mutagens with HCC risk using data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for known liver-cancer risk factors. RESULTS: During up to 32 years of follow-up, we documented 163 incident HCC cases. The HRs of HCC for the highest vs the lowest tertile intake levels were 1.84 (95% CI: 1.16-2.92, Ptrend = 0.04) for processed red meats and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40-0.91, Ptrend = 0.02) for total white meats. There was a null association between unprocessed red meats and HCC risk (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.68-1.63, Ptrend = 0.85). We found both poultry (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90, Ptrend = 0.01) and fish (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47-1.05, Ptrend = 0.10) were inversely associated with HCC risk. The HR for HCC risk was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61-1.02) when 1 standard deviation of processed red meats was substituted with an equivalent amount of poultry or fish intake. We also found a suggestive positive association of intake of meat-derived mutagenicity or heterocyclic amines with risk of HCC. CONCLUSIONS: Processed red meat intake might be associated with higher, whereas poultry or possibly fish intake might be associated with lower, risk of HCC. Replacing processed red meat with poultry or fish might be associated with reduced HCC risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyz146

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective studies showed that sugar-sweetened beverages and red meat consumption (unprocessed and processed) were associated with an increased risk of developing MASLD in a dose-dependent manner, liver cancer and liver disease-related mortality.

    “With regard to speci fi c nutrients or foods, prospective studies showed that sugar-sweetened beverages and red meat consumption (unprocessed and processed) were associated with an increased risk of developing MASLD (in a dose-dependent manner), 109,110 liver cancer and liver disease-related mortality.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Results (page not provided) report a significant association between processed red meat intake and hepatocellular carcinoma risk, a form of liver cancer. They report no significant association for unprocessed red meat; this paper does not establish the claimed links involving sugar-sweetened beverages, dose-dependent MASLD risk, or liver disease-related mortality. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. Tavani A, La Vecchia C, Gallus S et al. Red meat intake and cancer risk: a study in Italy. Int J Cancer 2000;86:425–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., Yang, W., Li, T., Liu, Y., Simon, T. G., Sui, J., Wu, K., Giovannucci, E. L., Chan, A. T., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Xuehong
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2019-07-13
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1863-1871
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2962246162
Cited by
69
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nurses’ Health Study infrastructure (P01 CA87969, UM1 CA167552)
  • NIH (K24 DK098311, K07 CA188126)
  • American Cancer Society Research Scholar (NEC-130476)
  • Boston Nutrition Obesity Research Center Pilot and Feasibility Award
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, meat consumption, processed red meat, unprocessed red meat, white meat, poultry, fish, heterocyclic amines, dietary substitution, liver cancer risk
MeSH terms
Red Meat, Aged, Animals, Diet, Female, Fishes, Follow-Up Studies, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Poultry, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review