The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do algorithms rule the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the GDPR and beyond
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proposition P2c The greater the integrity in terms of fairness an algorithm demonstrates, the higher the probability of building initial trust in AI-based algorithms.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Brkan, 2019
In the citing paper
“Proposition P2f. The greater the agency or autonomy an algorithm demonstrates, the lower the probability of building initial trust in AI-based algorithms.”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Brkan, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time
Cabiddu, F., Moi, L., Patriotta, G., & Allen, D. G. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.001 · Cited by 138
Contestable AI by Design: Towards a Framework
Alfrink, K., Keller, I., Kortuem, G., & Doorn, N. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-022-09611-z · Cited by 169
“This would include the features identified in our framework, first and foremost means of acquiring explanation and human intervention (Almada, 2019; Brkan, 2019; Walmsley, 2021).”
InfluentialBRKAN, M., & BONNET, G. (2020) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2020.10 · Cited by 63
Self-citationTowards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31
What’s the Appeal? Perceptions of Review Processes for Algorithmic Decisions
Lyons, H., Wijenayake, S., Miller, T., & Velloso, E. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517606 · Cited by 27
Sarra, C. (2020) · Global Jurist · doi:10.1515/gj-2020-0003 · Cited by 24
Algorithm Interpretation Right—The First Step to Algorithmic Governance
Zou, C., & Zhang, F. (2022) · Beijing Law Review · doi:10.4236/blr.2022.132015 · Cited by 9
Geburczyk, F. (2021) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105538 · Cited by 7
EU Administrative Decision-Making Delegated to Machines – Legal Challenges and Issues
Hubková, P. (2024) · AUC IURIDICA · doi:10.14712/23366478.2024.25 · Cited by 4
Advantages and Risks of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-making in Administrative Law
Akimovska Maletić, I. (2026) · Collection Regional Law Review · doi:10.56461/iup_rlrc.2026.7.ch2
AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING IN ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL MATTERS
Comenius University Bratislava, F. O. L., & Lengyel, A. (2025) · STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia · doi:10.33542/sic2025-s-07
L'acte administratif algorithmique
Stepanov, A. (2026) · doi:10.70675/adc05be3za62ez4b4fz81e7zabf744e60dbf
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
(2023) · The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603202
Metadata
- Authors
- Brkan, M.
- Affiliations
- Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
- ORCID
- Brkan, Maja
- Venue
- International Journal of Law and Information Technology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-121
- ISSN
- 0967-0769
- 1464-3693
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
