The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Animals
Open accessAbstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a critically important human pathogen that is also an emerging concern in veterinary medicine and animal agriculture. It is present in a wide range of animal species, including dogs, cats, rabbits, horses, cattle, pigs, poultry, and exotic species, both as a cause of infection and in healthy carriers. Identification of MRSA in various species and in food has led to concerns about the roles of animals, both pets and livestock, in the epidemiology of MRSA infection and colonization in humans. There is evidence of the role of food animals in human MRSA infections in some countries and of pets as a possible source of human infection. Some groups of individuals who work closely with animals, such as veterinarians, have high MRSA colonization rates. This article includes discussions of MRSA in human medicine, animals, and food, as well as its interspecies transmission, colonization, infection, strains, and affected populations. However, clear answers are lacking in many of these areas and limited studies may lead to premature conclusions. It is certain that animals are a source of human MRSA infection in some circumstances--but humans may also serve as sources of infection in animals. Changes in the epidemiology of MRSA in one species may be reflected in changes in other species. The true scope of MRSA in animals and its impact on human health are still only superficially understood, but it is clear that MRSA is a potentially important veterinary and public health concern that requires a great deal more study to enhance understanding and effective response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200 · Cited by 2,718
Miller, L. G., Perdreau-Remington, F., Rieg, G., Mehdi, S., Perlroth, J., Bayer, A. S., Tang, A. W., Phung, T. O., & Spellberg, B. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042683 · Cited by 1,053
Frazee, B. W., Lynn, J., Charlebois, E. D., Lambert, L., Lowery, D., & Perdreau-Remington, F. (2005) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.011 · Cited by 494
Frazee, B. W., Salz, T. O., Lambert, L., & Perdreau-Remington, F. (2005) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.05.023 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Cantas, L., Shah, S. Q. A., Cavaco, L. M., Manaia, C. M., Walsh, F., Popowska, M., Garelick, H., Bürgmann, H., & Sørum, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096 · Cited by 357
Pantosti, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00127 · Cited by 239
Caddey, B., Fisher, S., Barkema, H. W., & Nobrega, D. B. (2025) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00146-22 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Weese, J. S.
- Venue
- ILAR Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-244
- ISSN
- 1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150107096
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ilar.51.3.233
- The paper
- Weese, J. S. (2010). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Animals. ILAR Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.51.3.233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.