Cited by 89Infection Control and VentilationInfluenza Virus Research StudiesInfection Control in Healthcare

Transocular Entry of Seasonal Influenza-Attenuated Virus Aerosols and the Efficacy of N95 Respirators, Surgical Masks, and Eye Protection in Humans

Open access
Bischoff, W. E., Reid, T., Russell, G. B., Peters, T. R.·2011·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of barrier precautions to prevent influenza transmission is unknown. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants were exposed to monodispersed live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) particles (4.9 μm) in 6 groups: group 1, no precautions; group 2, ocular exposure only; group 3, surgical mask without eye protection; group 4, surgical mask with eye protection; group 5, fit-tested N95 respirator without eye protection; and group 6, fit-tested N95 respirator with eye protection. Influenza was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and culture in nasal washes. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Influenza was detected in 4 of 4 participants in group 1 (95% CI, 0-.60), 3 of 4 in group 2 (95% CI, .006-.806]), 5 of 5 in group 3 (95% CI, 0-.522), 5 of 5 in group 4, (95% CI, 0-.522), 3 of 5 in group 5 (95% CI, .053-.853), and 1 of 5 in group 6 (95% CI, .05-.72). RT-PCR revealed significant differences between group 1 and all other groups except group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Transocular transmission of LAIV occured in most participants suggesting the necessity of eye protection. An N95 respirator provided the best guard further enhanced by eye protection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jir238

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bischoff, W. E., Reid, T., Russell, G. B., & Peters, T. R.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2011-06-14
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
193-199
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2144384307
Cited by
89
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CI000474, 5u01ci000474-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
live attenuated influenza vaccine, airborne transmission, eye protection, N95 respirators, surgical masks, barrier precautions, ocular exposure, respiratory protection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerosols, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Mucosa, Respiratory Protective Devices, RNA, Viral, Eye Infections, Viral, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review