The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection
Open accessAbstract
Infection with any of the 4 dengue virus serotypes results in a diverse range of symptoms, from mild undifferentiated fever to life-threatening hemorrhagic fever and shock. Given that dengue virus infection elicits such a broad range of clinical symptoms, early and accurate laboratory diagnosis is essential for appropriate patient management. Virus detection and serological conversion have been the main targets of diagnostic assessment for many years, however cross-reactivity of antibody responses among the flaviviruses has been a confounding issue in providing a differential diagnosis. Furthermore, there is no single, definitive diagnostic biomarker that is present across the entire period of patient presentation, particularly in those experiencing a secondary dengue infection. Nevertheless, the development and commercialization of point-of-care combination tests capable of detecting markers of infection present during different stages of infection (viral nonstructural protein 1 and immunoglobulin M) has greatly simplified laboratory-based dengue diagnosis. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain in the clinical management of dengue-infected patients, especially in the absence of reliable biomarkers that provide an effective prognostic indicator of severe disease progression. This review briefly summarizes some of the complexities and issues surrounding clinical dengue diagnosis and the laboratory diagnostic options currently available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The global distribution and burden of dengue
Bhatt, S., Gething, P. W., Brady, O. J., Messina, J. P., Farlow, A. W., Moyes, C. L., Drake, J. M., Brownstein, J. S., Hoen, A. G., Sankoh, O., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12060 · Cited by 10,037 · cited 2×
“Infection with any of the 4 DENV serotypes can result in a range of clinical outcomes, with the majority of infections (70%–80%) being asymptomatic [10].”
The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus
Kraemer, M. U., Sinka, M. E., Duda, K. A., Mylne, A. Q., Shearer, F. M., Barker, C. M., Moore, C. G., Carvalho, R. G., Coelho, G. E., Van Bortel, W., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.08347 · Cited by 2,160
Dengue: a continuing global threat
Guzman, M. G., Halstead, S. B., Artsob, H., Buchy, P., Farrar, J., Gubler, D. J., Hunsperger, E., Kroeger, A., Margolis, H. S., Martínez, E., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2460 · Cited by 2,082
Lanciotti, R. S., Calisher, C. H., Gubler, D. J., Chang, G. J., & Vorndam, A. V. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.30.3.545-551.1992 · Cited by 1,818
Halstead, S. B. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61687-0 · Cited by 1,287
Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever
Rigau-Pérez, J. G., Clark, G. G., Gubler, D. J., Reiter, P., Sanders, E. J., & Vance Vorndam, A. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)12483-7 · Cited by 1,051
Libraty, D. H., Young, P. R., Pickering, D., Endy, T. P., Kalayanarooj, S., Green, S., Vaughn, D. W., Nisalak, A., Ennis, F. A., & Rothman, A. L. (2002) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/343813 · Cited by 739
Self-citationAlcon, S., Talarmin, A., Debruyne, M., Falconar, A., Deubel, V., & Flamand, M. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.02.376-381.2002 · Cited by 686
Early Clinical and Laboratory Indicators of Acute Dengue Illness
Kalayanarooj, S., Vaughn, D. W., Nimmannitya, S., Green, S., Suntayakorn, S., Kunentrasai, N., Viramitrachai, W., Ratanachu‐eke, S., Kiatpolpoj, S., Innis, B. L., et al. (1997) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514047 · Cited by 652
Modhiran, N., Watterson, D., Muller, D. A., Panetta, A. K., Sester, D. P., Liu, L., Hume, D. A., Stacey, K. J., & Young, P. R. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3863 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Cited by
Persistent Joint Pain Following Arthropod Virus Infections
Suchowiecki, K., Reid, S. P., Simon, G. L., Firestein, G. S., & Chang, A. (2021) · Current Rheumatology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11926-021-00987-y · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Muller, D. A., Depelsenaire, A. C. I., & Young, P. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- S89-S95
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2606996549
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/jiw649
- The paper
- Muller, D. A., Depelsenaire, A. C. I., & Young, P. R. (2017). Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.