Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification of distinct epitopes of endoglin, an RGD-containing glycoprotein of endothelial cells, leukemic cells, and syncytiotrophoblasts

Gougos, Anne, St Jacques, Sylvie, Greaves, Adonna, O'Connell, Phillp J., d'Apice, Anthony J. F., Bühring, Hans-J., Bernabeu, Carmelo, van Mourik, Jan A., Letarte, Michelle·1992·International Immunology

Abstract

Endoglin is a glycoprotein expressed predominantly on human endothelial cells. It was first identified with mAb 44G4, produced against the pre-B acute lymphoblastic HOON cell line. We now report that four mAbs independently produced against human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis, or U-937 pro-monocytic cells stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate also react with endoglin. High levels of reactivity of all mAbs were observed with HUVEC, while intermediate levels were seen with HOON and U-937 cells. By sequential immunoprecipitation from HUVEC and U-937 cell extracts, it was established that RMAC8, HEC-19, 8E11, and 1G2 mAbs react with the same protein as 44G4. Three distinct epitopes recognized by 44G4, RMAC8, and 1G2 mAbs were identified by competitive radioimmunoassay and flow cytometry. The HEC-19 epitope is spatially related to the 44G4 epitope, whereas the 8E11 epitope is most closely related to the 1G2 epitope. Western blot analysis showed that all antibodies react with the endoglin dimer (Mr = 170,000) purified from placenta. Immunostaining of sections of full-term placenta revealed reactivity not only with fetal vessels but also with the syncytiotrophoblast, the fetal cell layer which interfaces with maternal blood. When HUVEC monolayers were treated with the different mAbs to endoglin, prior to incubation with U-937 cells, a 5- to 10-fold stimulation of adhesion was observed. A fibronectin hexapeptide containing RGD, but not the corresponding RGE peptide, was capable of inhibiting the increased adhesion, when tested with mAb 44G4 and RMAC8. However, the same peptides had no effect on the binding of any of the five anti-endoglin mAbs to cells. Since 44G4 and RMAC8 recognize two distinct epitopes of endoglin, and since all five mAbs stimulated adhesion, the results suggest that a signal has been triggered through endoglin on HUVECs. Endoglin might be implicated either directly, by binding to a specific integrin-like ligand, or indirectly, by regulating the level of adhesion between certain integrins and their receptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/intimm/4.1.83

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Gougos, A., St Jacques, S., Greaves, A., O'Connell, P. J., d'Apice, A. J. F., Bühring, H.-J., Bernabeu, C., van Mourik, J. A., & Letarte, M.
Venue
International Immunology
Published
1992
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
83-92
ISSN
  • 0953-8178 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2377
OpenAlex
W1999422736
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of distinct epitopes of endoglin, an RGD-containing glycoprotein of endothelial cells, leukemic cells, and syncytiotrophoblasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intimm/4.1.83
The paper
Gougos, A., St Jacques, S., Greaves, A., O'Connell, P. J., d'Apice, A. J. F., Bühring, H.-J., Bernabeu, C., van Mourik, J. A., & Letarte, M. (1992). Identification of distinct epitopes of endoglin, an RGD-containing glycoprotein of endothelial cells, leukemic cells, and syncytiotrophoblasts. International Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/4.1.83

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.