Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 675

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate

Open access
Romero, Roberto, Nien, Jyh Kae, Espinoza, Jimmy, Todem, David, Fu, Wenjiang, Chung, Hwan, Kusanovic, Juan Pedro, Gotsch, Francesca, Erez, Offer, Mazaki-Tovi, Shali, Gomez, Ricardo, Edwin, Sam, Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn, Levine, Richard J., Karumanchi, S. Ananth·2008·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accumulating evidence suggests that an imbalance between pro-angiogenic (i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF)) and anti-angiogenic factors (i.e., soluble VEGF receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1, also referred to as sFlt1)) is involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia (PE). Endoglin is a protein that regulates the pro-angiogenic effects of transforming growth factor beta, and its soluble form has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of PE. The objective of this study was to determine if changes in maternal plasma concentration of these angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors differ prior to development of disease among patients with normal pregnancies and those destined to develop PE (preterm and term) or to deliver a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate. METHODS: This longitudinal nested case-control study included 144 singleton pregnancies in the following groups: (1) patients with uncomplicated pregnancies who delivered appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates (n = 46); (2) patients who delivered an SGA neonate but did not develop PE (n = 56); and (3) patients who developed PE (n = 42). Longitudinal samples were collected at each prenatal visit, scheduled at 4-week intervals from the first or early second trimester until delivery. Plasma concentrations of soluble endoglin (s-Eng), sVEGFR-1, and PlGF were determined by specific and sensitive ELISA. RESULTS: (1) Patients destined to deliver an SGA neonate had higher plasma concentrations of s-Eng throughout gestation than those with normal pregnancies; (2) patients destined to develop preterm PE and term PE had significantly higher concentrations of s-Eng than those with normal pregnancies at 23 and 30 weeks, respectively (for preterm PE: p < 0.036 and for term PE: p = 0.002); (3) patients destined to develop PE (term or preterm) and those who delivered an SGA neonate had lower plasma concentrations of PlGF than those with a normal pregnancy throughout gestation, and the maternal plasma concentration of this analyte became detectable later among patients with pregnancy complications, compared to normal pregnant women; (4) there were no significant differences in the plasma concentrations of sVEGFR-1 between patients destined to deliver an SGA neonate and those with normal pregnancies; (5) patients destined to develop preterm and term PE had a significantly higher plasma concentration of sVEGFR-1 at 26 and 29 weeks of gestation than controls (p = 0.009 and p = 0.0199, respectively); and (6) there was no significant difference in the increment of sVEGFR-1 between control patients and those who delivered an SGA neonate (p = 0.147 at 25 weeks and p = 0.8285 at 40 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Changes in the maternal plasma concentration of s-Eng, sVEGFR-1, and PlGF precede the clinical presentation of PE, but only changes in s-Eng and PlGF precede the delivery of an SGA neonate; and (2) differences in the profile of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic response to intrauterine insults may determine whether a patient will deliver an SGA neonate, develop PE, or both.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767050701830480

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 675

Metadata

Authors
Romero, R., Nien, J. K., Espinoza, J., Todem, D., Fu, W., Chung, H., Kusanovic, J. P., Gotsch, F., Erez, O., Mazaki-Tovi, S., Gomez, R., Edwin, S., Chaiworapongsa, T., Levine, R. J., & Karumanchi, S. A.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2008-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
9-23
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W1990795537
Cited by
675
References
86
FWCI
52.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14767050701830480
The paper
Romero, R., Nien, J. K., Espinoza, J., Todem, D., Fu, W., Chung, H., Kusanovic, J. P., Gotsch, F., Erez, O., Mazaki-Tovi, S., Gomez, R., Edwin, S., Chaiworapongsa, T., Levine, R. J., & Karumanchi, S. A. (2008). A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050701830480

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.