The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance
Abstract
The high prevalence of nosocomial infections in critically ill ICU patients is associated with high antibiotic consumption. Besides its economic impact, there is the constant threat of selection and induction of antibiotic resistance. Surveillance studies recording the incidence of infections, antibiotic use, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of pathogens supply vital information regarding infection control and prevention of antibiotic resistance. In order to analyse antibiotic consumption we recorded antibiotic use in a general ICU during one year by categorizing the indications for antibiotic use into three groups; (i) prophylaxis; (ii) therapy for a bacteriologically proven infection (BPI); (iii) therapy for a non-bacteriologically proven infection (non-BPI). Bronchoscopic techniques were used to diagnose pneumonia. In practice, BPI must be treated, but a proportion of antibiotics prescribed for non-BPI may be unnecessary. The subdivision in BPI and non-BPI may help to identify these cases. In all, 515 patients were admitted to ICU and 36% of these had at least one infection. Of all infections, 53% were ICU-acquired and 99% of these occurred in intubated patients. Antibiotics were prescribed in 61% of admissions. Of all antibiotics prescribed for therapy, 49% were for respiratory tract infections, 19% for abdominal infections and 13% for sepsis eci. Categorized by indication, 59% of all antibiotic prescriptions were for BPI, 28% for non-BPI and 13% for prophylaxis. A theoretical reduction of 25% in the number of non-BPI prescriptions would result only in a 7% decrease of total antibiotic use. We conclude that almost all antibiotics prescribed were for intubated patients and for BPI. Respiratory infections were the single most common infection and accounted for 49% of all antibiotics used. Therefore, in our setting, prevention of respiratory tract infections is probably the most effective mode to reduce antibiotic use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chastre, J., Wolff, M., Fagon, J.-Y., Chevret, S., Thomas, F., Wermert, D., Clementi, E., Gonzalez, J., Jusserand, D., Asfar, P., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2588 · Cited by 1,376
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., BONTEN, M. J. M., GAILLARD, C. A., PALING, J. C., van der GEEST, S., van TIEL, F. H., BEYSENS, A. J., de LEEUW, P. W., & STOBBERINGH, E. E. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2005003 · Cited by 339
Self-citationYoung, T. M., Bray, A. S., Nagpal, R. K., Caudell, D. L., Yadav, H., & Zafar, M. A. (2020) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00071-20 · Cited by 96
(2015) · PubMed · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergmans, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 527-535
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2137036515
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/39.4.527
- The paper
- Bergmans, D. (1997). Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/39.4.527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.