Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia by Oral Decontamination: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

BERGMANS, DENNIS C. J. J., BONTEN, MARC J. M., GAILLARD, CARLO A., PALING, JOHAN C., van der GEEST, SIEBE, van TIEL, FRANK H., BEYSENS, ANTON J., de LEEUW, PETER W., STOBBERINGH, ELLEN E.·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Colonization of the intestinal tract has been assumed to be important in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but relative impacts of oropharyngeal, gastric, or intestinal colonization have not been elucidated. Our aim was to prevent VAP by modulation of oropharyngeal colonization, without influencing gastric and intestinal colonization and without systemic prophylaxis. In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 87 patients received topical antimicrobial prophylaxis (gentamicin/ colistin/vancomycin 2% in Orabase, every 6 h) in the oropharynx and 139 patients, divided over two control groups, received placebo (78 patients were studied in the presence of patients receiving topical prophylaxis [control group A] and 61 patients were studied in an intensive care unit where no topical prophylaxis was used [control group B]). Baseline characteristics were comparable in all three groups. Topical prophylaxis eradicated colonization present on admission in oropharynx (75% in study group versus 0% in control group A [p < 0.00001] and 9% in control group B patients [p < 0.00001]) and in trachea (52% versus 22% in A [p = 0.03] and 7% in B [p = 0.004]). Moreover, topical prophylaxis prevented acquired oropharyngeal colonization (10% versus 59% in A [p < 0.00001] and 63% in B [p < 0.00001]). Colonization rates in stomach and intestine were not affected. Incidences of VAP were 10% in study patients, 31% in Group A, and 23% in Group B patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively). This was not associated with shorter durations of ventilation or ICU stay or better survival. Oropharyngeal colonization is of paramount importance in the pathogenesis of VAP, and a targeted approach to prevent colonization at this site is a very effective method of infection prevention. KEYWORDS: cross infection, prevention and control; respiration, artificial, adverse effects; antibiotics, administration and dosage infection control methods; pneumonia, etiology, prevention and control; intubation, intratracheal, adverse effects

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2005003

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., BONTEN, M. J. M., GAILLARD, C. A., PALING, J. C., van der GEEST, S., van TIEL, F. H., BEYSENS, A. J., de LEEUW, P. W., & STOBBERINGH, E. E.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
382-388
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2138605025
Cited by
339
References
26
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia by Oral Decontamination: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2005003
The paper
BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., BONTEN, M. J. M., GAILLARD, C. A., PALING, J. C., van der GEEST, S., van TIEL, F. H., BEYSENS, A. J., de LEEUW, P. W., & STOBBERINGH, E. E. (2001). Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia by Oral Decontamination: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2005003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.