Cited by 31Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityImmunotoxicology and immune responsesAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Comparison of the toxicity of fluconazole and other azole antifungal drugs to murine and human granulocyte–macrophage progenitor cells in vitro

Open access
Benkoo, I.·1999·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

We studied the inhibitory effects on colony formation by granulocyte-macrophage colony forming units (cfu-gm) of eight azole antifungal agents in vitro. All agents, except fluconazole, inhibited colony formation dose-dependently with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in the range of 0.78-49 micromol/L in cultures of murine and human bone marrow. For human cells, the IC50 values were 0.553 mg/L for itraconazole, 1.24 mg/L for saperconazole, 2.58 mg/L for clotrimazole, 5.33 mg/L for miconazole, 6.17 mg/L for econazole, 6.27 mg/L for ketoconazole and 8.38 mg/L for oxiconazole. The IC50 of itraconazole for human cfu-gm in vitro was similar to the plasma level of this drug recommended for systemic antifungal therapy (>0.5 mg/L) thus indicating the potential clinical relevance of our data. The IC50 of ketoconazole for human cfu-gm in vitro may be exceeded by plasma levels produced in vivo by high (> or =400 mg) doses, whereas fluconazole failed to reduce colony formation by 50% even at 100 mg/L, a concentration not reached in vivo even after extremely high doses (2000 mg/day). To most of the drugs studied, murine progenitor cells seemed to be less sensitive than the human ones. There was, however, a close correlation between the murine and human log IC50 values of the drugs (r2 = 0.964, P< 0.001), suggesting that cultures of murine bone marrow may be suitable to predict the in-vitro toxicity of azole antifungals to human cfu-gm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/43.5.675

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benkoo, I.
Affiliations
University of Debrecen (HU)
Corresponding author
Benkoo, I.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
675-681
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2117988795
Cited by
31
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
fluconazole, azole antifungals, CFU-GM, myelosuppression, bone marrow progenitor cells, colony formation inhibition, itraconazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, econazole, oxiconazole, in vitro toxicity prediction, dose-dependent toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Bone Marrow, Cells, Cultured, Clotrimazole, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Econazole, Female, Granulocytes, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Imidazoles, Ketoconazole, Macrophages, Male, Miconazole, Species Specificity, Stem Cells, Fluconazole, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review