The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
Abstract
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that will inhibit the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation, and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial that will prevent the growth of an organism after subculture on to antibiotic-free media. MICs are used by diagnostic laboratories mainly to confirm resistance, but most often as a research tool to determine the in vitro activity of new antimicrobials, and data from such studies have been used to determine MIC breakpoints. MBC determinations are undertaken less frequently and their major use has been reserved for isolates from the blood of patients with endocarditis. Standardized methods for determining MICs and MBCs are described in this paper. Like all standardized procedures, the method must be adhered to and may not be adapted by the user. The method gives information on the storage of standard antibiotic powder, preparation of stock antibiotic solutions, media, preparation of inocula, incubation conditions, and reading and interpretation of results. Tables giving expected MIC ranges for control NCTC and ATCC strains are also supplied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This difference is important to consider when performing experiments that depend on the number of cellular divisions or cells present, such as cellular communication [12, 13] and antibiotic susceptibility [14–17] and biofilms [18].”
From Estimating microbial population data from optical density (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,736
Winstanley, T. G., EDWARDS, C., Limb, D. I., MEGSON, K., & Spencer, R. C. (1994) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/33.2.353 · Cited by 13
Yeo, S.-F., & Livermore, D. M. (1994) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-40-4-252 · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Report of the Working Party on Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing of the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. (1991). A guide to sensitivity testing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 27, Suppl. D, 1-50.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wiegand, I., Hilpert, K., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · Cited by 6,156
Manyi-Loh, C., Mamphweli, S., Meyer, E., & Okoh, A. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23040795 · Cited by 1,808
Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens
Pendleton, J. N., Gorman, S. P., & Gilmore, B. (2013) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/eri.13.12 · Cited by 1,420
Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action of Ferulic and Gallic Acids Against Pathogenic Bacteria
Borges, A. D. S., Ferreira, C., Saavedra, M. J., & Simões, M. V. (2013) · Microbial Drug Resistance · doi:10.1089/mdr.2012.0244 · Cited by 1,311
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance
Kowalska−Krochmal, B., & Dudek-Wicher, R. K. (2021) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens10020165 · Cited by 1,107
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Andrews, Jennifer M.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2132963724
- Cited by
- 4,129
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 177 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 253 · 2023: 265 · 2022: 311 · 2021: 287 · 2020: 309 · 2019: 255 · 2018: 232 · 2017: 213 · 2016: 238 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 209 · 2012: 144
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Keywords
- minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum bactericidal concentration, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, standardized test methods, antimicrobial resistance, MIC breakpoints, control strains
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Microbial Sensitivity Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review