The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors associated with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection including previous use of antimicrobials
Open accessAbstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major nosocomial pathogen worldwide. To investigate an association between antimicrobial use and MRSA, a case control study of 121 patients infected with MRSA compared with 123 patients infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was carried out. Antimicrobial use was analysed by three different logistic regression models: all beta-lactam antibiotics, beta-lactam antibiotics grouped in classes and antimicrobial use in grammes. Patients infected with MRSA tended to have more co-morbidities, longer lengths of stay (LOS) and greater exposure to antibiotics than MSSA-infected patients. Multivariate analysis identified levofloxacin [odds ratio (OR) 8.01], macrolides (OR 4.06), previous hospitalization (OR 1.95), enteral feedings (OR 2.55), surgery (OR 2.24) and LOS before culture (OR 1.03) as independently associated with MRSA infection. All models were concordant with the exception of macrolides, which were not significant based on the number of grammes administered. There were no significant differences in the types of infection or the attributed mortality in either group. MRSA-infected patients had a significantly longer LOS before infection [18.8 +/- 18.2 compared with 8.4 +/- 6.9 (P < 0.001)] and a significantly longer post-diagnosis LOS [27.8 +/- 32.9 compared with 18.6 +/- 21 (P = 0.01)] than MSSA-infected patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Blumenthal, K. G., Lu, N., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Walensky, R. P., & Choi, H. K. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k2400 · Cited by 357
Thabit, A. K., Crandon, J. L., & Nicolau, D. P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.993381 · Cited by 160
Egyir, B., Guardabassi, L., Sørum, M., Nielsen, S. S., Kolekang, A., Frimpong, E., Addo, K. K., Newman, M. J., & Larsen, A. R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089716 · Cited by 108
Shuping, L. L., Kuonza, L., Musekiwa, A., Iyaloo, S., & Perovic, O. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188216 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Graffunder, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 999-1005
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2144448184
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors associated with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection including previous use of antimicrobials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkf009
- The paper
- Graffunder, E. M. (2002). Risk factors associated with nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection including previous use of antimicrobials. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkf009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.