Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals

Open access
Dannaoui, E.·2003·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

In vitro susceptibilities of 36 zygomycete isolates, belonging to six genera, to itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, terbinafine, amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine were determined by using a broth microdilution adaptation of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M-38P reference method. The influence of incubation time on MIC values, and the performance of a spectrophotometric method for MIC determination in comparison with the visual reference method, were also evaluated. Amphotericin B was active against most of the isolates. All the isolates were highly resistant to 5-fluorocytosine (MICs > 256 mg/L). Voriconazole was significantly less active than the other drugs with an overall MIC(90) (MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited) of 32 mg/L. In contrast, posaconazole showed good activity (MIC(90) 1 mg/L). A wide range of MICs, from 0.03 to > or =32 mg/L, was obtained for itraconazole and terbinafine. Differences in susceptibility between and within genera were noted. Rhizopus spp. were significantly less susceptible to itraconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine and amphotericin B than Absidia spp., and less susceptible than Mucor spp. to amphotericin B. Terbinafine appeared to be more active against Rhizopus microsporus than against Rhizopus oryzae (geometric mean MIC of 0.15 and 64 mg/L, respectively). The activity of the drugs was dependent on the incubation period. A significant increase in MICs was noted between 24 and 48 h of incubation. On the other hand, the two methods used for MIC determination (visual and spectrophotometric readings) showed good agreement. These results suggest that the zygomycetes are a heterogeneous group for antifungal susceptibility. Some of the conventional and new antifungals are effective in vitro; their efficacies in vivo remain to be determined. The spectrophotometric method appears to be a valuable alternative to the visual method for MIC determination for zygomycetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkg020

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Dannaoui, E.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2002-11-28
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
45-52
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2126638225
Cited by
314
References
5
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkg020
The paper
Dannaoui, E. (2003). In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.