Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe

Ferech, Matus, Coenen, Samuel, Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi, Dvorakova, Katerina, Hendrickx, Erik, Suetens, Carl, Goossens, Herman·2006·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on more than a decade of outpatient quinolone use were collected from 33 European countries within the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) project, funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). METHODS: For the period 1997-2009, data on outpatient use of systemic quinolones aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/defined daily dose (DDD) method (WHO, version 2011), and expressed in DDD and packages per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID and PID, respectively). Using a classification based on pharmacokinetic and in vitro potency profiles, quinolone use was analysed with regard to trends over time, seasonal variation and composition. RESULTS: Total outpatient quinolone use in 2009 varied by a factor of 7.5 between the country with the highest (Italy, 3.61 DID) and the country with the lowest (the UK, 0.48 DID) quinolone use. The second-generation quinolones accounted for >50% of quinolone use (mainly ciprofloxacin), except for Croatia, where first-generation quinolones (mainly norfloxacin) were mostly used. A significant increase in outpatient quinolone use was found for Europe, as well as a large seasonal variation, which increased significantly over time from 1997 to 2009. Relative use of third-generation quinolones significantly increased over time with respect to the use of second-generation quinolones, while the relative use of both significantly increased with respect to the first-generation quinolones. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin (respiratory quinolones) represented >10% of quinolone outpatient use in 17 countries, with extreme seasonal variation in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial increase and change in the pattern of quinolone use between 1997 and 2009, a period during which quinolones that are effective for the treatment of respiratory tract infections were introduced. These quinolones are not the first-line antibiotics for this indication and their use should generally be limited, and quinolones should ideally show no substantial seasonal variation in terms of their use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkl188

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Ferech, M., Coenen, S., Malhotra-Kumar, S., Dvorakova, K., Hendrickx, E., Suetens, C., & Goossens, H.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2006-05-30
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
401-407
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2130752053
Cited by
598
References
0
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkl188
The paper
Ferech, M., Coenen, S., Malhotra-Kumar, S., Dvorakova, K., Hendrickx, E., Suetens, C., & Goossens, H. (2006). European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.