The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased mutability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are frequently hypermutable due to selection of mutants with defects in DNA repair genes such as mutS. Since P. aeruginosa grows as a biofilm within the infected CF lung, it is possible that this mode of growth enhances the mutability of the organism thereby increasing the opportunity to derive permanent hypermutators through mutation in DNA repair genes. We have now conducted experiments to examine this possibility. METHODS: Using established procedures, we examined the mutability of P. aeruginosa PA01 in planktonic cultures and in biofilm cultures generated by growth in a Sorbarod system. Transcriptional profiling by DNA microarray was used to compare gene expression in planktonic and biofilm cells. RESULTS: Mutation frequency determinations for resistance to rifampicin and ciprofloxacin demonstrated that biofilm cultures of P. aeruginosa displayed up to a 105-fold increase in mutability compared with planktonic cultures. Several genes (ahpC, katA, sodB and PA3529, a probable peroxidase) that encode enzymes conferring protection against oxidative DNA damage were down-regulated in biofilm cells. In particular, katA, which encodes the major pseudomonal antioxidant catalase, was down-regulated 7.7-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Down-regulation of antioxidant enzymes in P. aeruginosa biofilms may enhance the rate of mutagenic events due to the accumulation of DNA damage. Since P. aeruginosa forms biofilms in the CF lung, this mode of growth may enhance the direct selection of antibiotic-resistant organisms in CF patients and also increase the opportunity to derive permanent hypermutators thereby providing a further source of antibiotic-resistant mutants in the CF lung.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence
Moradali, M. F., Ghods, S., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039 · Cited by 1,537
Campoccia, D., Montanaro, L., Speziale, P., & Arciola, C. R. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.005 · Cited by 392
Borges, A., Abreu, A., Dias, C., Saavedra, M., Borges, F., & Simões, M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070877 · Cited by 308
Trejo-Hernández, A., Andrade-Domínguez, A., Hernández, M., & Encarnación, S. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.53 · Cited by 135
He, Y., Peterson, B. W., Jongsma, M. A., Ren, Y., Sharma, P. K., Busscher, H. J., & van der Mei, H. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063750 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Driffield, K., Miller, K., Bostock, J. M., O'Neill, A. J., & Chopra, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1053-1056
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2164416282
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased mutability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkn044
- The paper
- Driffield, K., Miller, K., Bostock, J. M., O'Neill, A. J., & Chopra, I. (2008). Increased mutability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.