The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The biological fitness cost of antibiotic resistance is a key parameter in determining the rate of appearance and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We identified mutations conferring nitrofurantoin resistance and examined their effect on the fitness of clinical Escherichia coli isolates. METHODS: By plating bacterial cells on agar plates containing nitrofurantoin, spontaneous nitrofurantoin-resistant E. coli mutants were isolated. The fitness of susceptible and resistant strains was measured as growth rate in the presence and absence of nitrofurantoin in rich culture medium. Time-kill kinetics of the resistant mutants was compared with the susceptible strains. Resistance mutations were identified by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Spontaneous resistant mutants of initially susceptible clinical E. coli appeared with a rate of 10(-7)/cell/generation, and these mutants showed a reduction in the growth rate compared with the susceptible parent strain. Similarly, comparison of a set of susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of E. coli showed that the average growth rate of the resistant mutants was approximately 6% lower than the susceptible strains. Furthermore, the bacterial growth rate in the presence of nitrofurantoin at therapeutic levels was greatly reduced even for nitrofurantoin-resistant mutants. The resistance-conferring mutations were identified in the nsfA and nfsB genes that encode oxygen-insensitive nitroreductases. CONCLUSIONS: Nitrofurantoin resistance confers a reduction in fitness in E. coli in the absence of antibiotic. In the presence of therapeutic levels of nitrofurantoin, even resistant mutants are so disturbed in growth that they are probably unable to become enriched and establish an infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations
Lea, D. E., & Coulson, C. A. (1949) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02986080 · Cited by 1,450
Cited by
A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · Cited by 2,463
The genetic basis of the fitness costs of antimicrobial resistance: a meta‐analysis approach
Vogwill, T., & MacLean, R. C. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12202 · Cited by 443
Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
Huttner, A., Verhaegh, E. M., Harbarth, S., Muller, A. E., Theuretzbacher, U., & Mouton, J. W. (2015) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkv147 · Cited by 267
A Comparison of Methods to Measure Fitness in Escherichia coli
Wiser, M. J., & Lenski, R. E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126210 · Cited by 162
Bircher, L., Geirnaert, A., Hammes, F., Lacroix, C., & Schwab, C. (2018) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13265 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandegren, L., Lindqvist, A., Kahlmeter, G., & Andersson, D. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 495-503
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W2146133581
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkn222
- The paper
- Sandegren, L., Lindqvist, A., Kahlmeter, G., & Andersson, D. I. (2008). Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.