The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Nitrofurantoin's use has increased exponentially since recent guidelines repositioned it as first-line therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess nitrofurantoin's efficacy and toxicity in the treatment of lower UTI. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all human controlled clinical trials published from 1946 to 2014 and assessing short-term (≤14 days) nitrofurantoin for lower UTI. Meta-analyses assessing efficacy and adverse events were conducted on randomized trials. RESULTS: Twenty-seven controlled trials including 4807 patients fulfilled entry criteria; most were conducted between the 1970s and 1990s and were at increased risk for various biases. Nitrofurantoin appears to have good clinical and microbiological efficacy for UTI caused by common uropathogens, with clinical cure rates varying between 79% and 92%. The most methodologically robust studies surveyed indicate overall equivalence between nitrofurantoin when given for 5 or 7 days and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials confirmed equivalence in clinical cure, but indicated a slight advantage to comparator drugs in microbiological efficacy (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97). If given for only 3 days, nitrofurantoin's clinical efficacy was diminished (61%-70%). Toxicity was infrequent (5%-16% in the 17 reporting studies), mild, reversible and predominantly gastrointestinal; meta-analyses confirmed no difference between nitrofurantoin and comparators. Hypersensitivity reactions such as pulmonary fibrosis and hepatotoxicity were not observed. Acquisition of resistance to nitrofurantoin is still relatively rare. CONCLUSIONS: When given short term for lower UTI, nitrofurantoin has good clinical and microbiological efficacy; toxicity is mild and predominantly gastrointestinal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Gupta, K., Hooton, T. M., Naber, K. G., Wullt, B., Colgan, R., Miller, L. G., Moran, G. J., Nicolle, L. E., Raz, R., Schaeffer, A. J., et al. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciq257 · Cited by 3,038
McOsker, C. C., & Fitzpatrick, P. M. (1994) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/33.suppl_a.23 · Cited by 268
Christiaens, T. C. M., Meyere, M. D., Verschraegen, G., Peersman, W., Heytens, S., & Maeseneer, J. M. D. (2002) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 260
Kahlmeter, G., & Poulsen, H. O. (2012) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.013 · Cited by 256
Sanchez, G. V., Master, R. N., Karlowsky, J. A., & Bordon, J. M. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.06060-11 · Cited by 221
de Greeff, S. C., & Jw, M. (2017) · Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) · doi:10.21945/rivm-2017-0056 · Cited by 208
Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli
Sandegren, L., Lindqvist, A., Kahlmeter, G., & Andersson, D. I. (2008) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkn222 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Hawkey, P. M., Warren, R. E., Livermore, D. M., McNulty, C. A. M., Enoch, D. A., Otter, J. A., & Wilson, A. P. R. (2018) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dky027 · Cited by 334
Johnson, K. L., Dumkow, L. E., Salvati, L. A., Johnson, K. M., Yee, M. A., & Egwuatu, N. E. (2021) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2020.1255 · Cited by 26
Resistance to nitrofurantoin is an indicator of extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae
Khamari, B., Kumar, P., & Pradeep, B. E. (2021) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001347 · Cited by 17
Steenhuis, M., Koningstein, G. M., Oswald, J., Pick, T., O’Keefe, S., Koch, H., Cavalié, A., Whitehead, R. C., Swanton, E., High, S., et al. (2021) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.14589 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Huttner, A., Verhaegh, E. M., Harbarth, S., Muller, A. E., Theuretzbacher, U., & Mouton, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-11
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2456-2464
- ISSN
- 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2091
- OpenAlex
- W1963457120
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkv147
- The paper
- Huttner, A., Verhaegh, E. M., Harbarth, S., Muller, A. E., Theuretzbacher, U., & Mouton, J. W. (2015). Nitrofurantoin revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.