Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics

Livermore, D. M., on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development, Blaser, M., Carrs, O., Cassell, G., Fishman, N., Guidos, R., Levy, S., Powers, J., Norrby, R., Tillotson, G., Davies, R., Projan, S., Dawson, M., Monnet, D., Keogh-Brown, M., Hand, K., Garner, S., Findlay, D., Morel, C., Wise, R., Bax, R., Burke, F., Chopra, I., Czaplewski, L., Finch, R., Livermore, D., Piddock, L. J. V., White, T.·2011·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

The dwindling supply of new antibiotics largely reflects regulatory and commercial challenges, but also a failure of discovery. In the 1990s the pharmaceutical industry abandoned its classical ways of seeking antibiotics and instead adopted a strategy that combined genomics with high-throughput screening of existing compound libraries. Too much emphasis was placed on identifying targets and molecules that bound to them, and too little emphasis was placed on the ability of these molecules to permeate bacteria, evade efflux and avoid mutational resistance; moreover, the compound libraries were systematically biased against antibiotics. The sorry result is that no antibiotic found by this strategy has yet entered clinical use and many major pharmaceutical companies have abandoned antibiotic discovery. Although a raft of start-up companies-variously financed by venture capital, charity or public money--are now finding new antibiotic compounds (some of them very promising in vitro or in early trials), their development through Phase III depends on financial commitments from large pharmaceutical companies, where the discouraging regulatory environment and the poor likely return on investment remain paramount issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkr262

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Livermore, D. M., on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development, Blaser, M., Carrs, O., Cassell, G., Fishman, N., Guidos, R., Levy, S., Powers, J., Norrby, R., Tillotson, G., Davies, R., Projan, S., Dawson, M., Monnet, D., Keogh-Brown, M., Hand, K., Garner, S., Findlay, D., Morel, C., Wise, R., Bax, R., Burke, F., Chopra, I., Czaplewski, L., Finch, R., Livermore, D., Piddock, L. J. V., & White, T.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2011-06-23
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1941-1944
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2170882399
Cited by
284
References
2
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jac/dkr262
The paper
Livermore, D. M., on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development, Blaser, M., Carrs, O., Cassell, G., Fishman, N., Guidos, R., Levy, S., Powers, J., Norrby, R., Tillotson, G., Davies, R., Projan, S., Dawson, M., Monnet, D., Keogh-Brown, M., Hand, K., Garner, S., Findlay, D., . . . White, T. (2011). Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.