Cited by 48Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

The novel arylamidine T-2307 demonstrates in vitro and in vivo activity against echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata

Open access
Wiederhold, Nathan P., Najvar, Laura K., Fothergill, Annette W., Bocanegra, Rosie, Olivo, Marcos, McCarthy, Dora I., Fukuda, Yoshiko, Mitsuyama, Junichi +1 more·2016·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Candida species are major causes of invasive mycoses in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Treatment options are limited in the setting of antifungal resistance and increased rates of echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata have been reported. The novel arylamidine T-2307 demonstrates potent in vitro antifungal activity against Candida species. Our objective was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of T-2307 against resistant C. glabrata. METHODS: In vitro activity was determined against 42 clinical C. glabrata isolates, including 17 echinocandin-resistant strains. Neutropenic ICR mice were inoculated intravenously with an echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata isolate (T-2307; caspofungin MICs ≤0.008 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively). Therapy with vehicle control, T-2307 (0.75, 1.5, 3 or 6 mg/kg subcutaneously once daily) or caspofungin (1 or 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily) began 1 day post-challenge. Kidneys were collected on day 8 and fungal burden was assessed by counting cfu. RESULTS: T-2307 demonstrated potent in vitro activity against C. glabrata (geometric mean MIC 0.0135 mg/L), which was maintained against echinocandin-resistant isolates (geometric mean MIC 0.0083 mg/L). T-2307 also demonstrated in vivo efficacy in mice infected with echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata. Significant reductions in fungal burden were observed at each dosage level of T-2307 compared with control. Reductions in fungal burden were also observed with high-dose caspofungin. CONCLUSIONS: T-2307 demonstrated potent in vitro activity against C. glabrata, including echinocandin-resistant isolates, which translated into in vivo efficacy against invasive candidiasis caused by an echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata strain. These results demonstrate the potential for T-2307 as therapy against echinocandin-resistant Candida.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkv398

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • T-2307 is effective against drug-resistant fungal isolates both in vitro and in vivo, including echinocandin-resistant C. albicans and Candida glabrata and azole-resistant C. albicans.

    “Moreover, T-2307 is effective against drug-resistant fungal isolates both in vitro and in vivo, which highlights its potent antifungal activities against echinocandin-resistant C. albicans and Candida glabrata and azole-resistant C. albicans (29, 32–34).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiederhold, N. P., Najvar, L. K., Fothergill, A. W., Bocanegra, R., Olivo, M., McCarthy, D. I., Fukuda, Y., Mitsuyama, J., & Patterson, T. F.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wiederhold, Nathan P.
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2015-11-29
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
692-695
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2253339103
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Department of Health and Human Services (HHS272201000018I, HHSN272201000038I)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, echinocandin resistance, invasive candidiasis, antifungal activity, caspofungin, fungal burden, neutropenic mice, antifungal drug development
MeSH terms
Amidines, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Kidney, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Colony Count, Microbial, Treatment Outcome, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review