Cited by 43Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

Oral glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078 is effective in an experimental murine model of invasive candidiasis caused by WT and echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata

Open access
Wiederhold, Nathan P, Najvar, Laura K, Jaramillo, Rosie, Olivo, Marcos, Pizzini, Jason, Catano, Gabriel, Patterson, Thomas F·2018·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Background: Echinocandins are recommended as first-line therapy against Candida glabrata infections, although increased resistance to this class has been reported worldwide and they are currently only available for parenteral administration. SCY-078 is an investigational glucan synthase inhibitor that is orally available. Objectives: To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of SCY-078 in an experimental model of invasive candidiasis due to WT and echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata isolates. Methods: Neutropenic ICR mice were inoculated intravenously with a WT isolate (SCY-078 and caspofungin MICs 0.25 and 0.125 mg/L, respectively) or an echinocandin-resistant isolate (SCY-078 and caspofungin MICs 1 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively). Treatment with placebo, SCY-078 (8, 30 or 40 mg/kg orally every 12 h) or caspofungin (1 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection once daily) began 24 h later. Kidney fungal burden was measured on day 8 post-inoculation. Results: Significant reductions in kidney fungal burden were observed with 30 mg/kg SCY-078 against both isolates and with the 40 mg/kg dose against the echinocandin-resistant isolate. These results were supported by SCY-078 plasma concentration data at the higher doses, where levels above the MICs for both isolates were observed 12 h after the last oral dose. Reductions in fungal burden were also observed with caspofungin against the WT isolate, but not against the resistant isolate. Conclusions: SCY-078 demonstrated in vivo efficacy against infections caused by both WT and echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata isolates in this experimental model. This orally available glucan synthase inhibitor has potential as a therapy against echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dkx422

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCY-078 appears to be active against echinocandin-resistant and azole-resistant Candida strains, including C. auris.

    “Importantly, SCY-078 appears to be active against echinocandin-resistant and azole-resistant Candida strains, including C. auris [111,112,113].”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts-Third Edition: Approved Standard M27-A3. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2008.
  2. Trucksis M, Garrett G, Bautmans A et al. A phase I multi-rising dose study evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MK-3118, oral glucan synthase inhibitor in healthy volunteers. In: Abstracts of the Fifty-first Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011. Abstract F1-1390. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiederhold, N. P., Najvar, L. K., Jaramillo, R., Olivo, M., Pizzini, J., Catano, G., & Patterson, T. F.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wiederhold, Nathan P
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
448-451
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2770721343
Cited by
43
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
invasive candidiasis, Candida glabrata, echinocandin resistance, caspofungin, oral antifungal therapy, neutropenic mice, kidney fungal burden, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Administration, Oral, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Disease Models, Animal, Glycosides, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Kidney, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Placebos, Triterpenes, Colony Count, Microbial, Treatment Outcome, Candida glabrata, Candidiasis, Invasive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review