Cited by 66Machine Learning in HealthcarePrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Generating sequential electronic health records using dual adversarial autoencoder

Open access
Lee, Dongha, Yu, Hwanjo, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Rogith, Deevakar, Gudala, Meghana, Tejani, Mubeen, Zhang, Qiuchen, Xiong, Li·2020·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objective Recent studies on electronic health records (EHRs) started to learn deep generative models and synthesize a huge amount of realistic records, in order to address significant privacy issues surrounding the EHR. However, most of them only focus on structured records about patients' independent visits, rather than on chronological clinical records. In this article, we aim to learn and synthesize realistic sequences of EHRs based on the generative autoencoder. Materials and methods We propose a dual adversarial autoencoder (DAAE), which learns set-valued sequences of medical entities, by combining a recurrent autoencoder with 2 generative adversarial networks (GANs). DAAE improves the mode coverage and quality of generated sequences by adversarially learning both the continuous latent distribution and the discrete data distribution. Using the MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III) and UT Physicians clinical databases, we evaluated the performances of DAAE in terms of predictive modeling, plausibility, and privacy preservation. Results Our generated sequences of EHRs showed the comparable performances to real data for a predictive modeling task, and achieved the best score in plausibility evaluation conducted by medical experts among all baseline models. In addition, differentially private optimization of our model enables to generate synthetic sequences without increasing the privacy leakage of patients' data. Conclusions DAAE can effectively synthe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocaa119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, D., Yu, H., Jiang, X., Rogith, D., Gudala, M., Tejani, M., Zhang, Q., & Xiong, L.
Affiliations
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Yu, Hwanjo
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1411-1419
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W3090025689
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01TR002062)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM118574, R01GM114612)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
electronic health records, synthetic data generation, recurrent autoencoder, generative adversarial networks, sequence generation, privacy preservation, differential privacy, mode coverage, MIMIC-III
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Computer Simulation, Confidentiality, Humans, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review