Cited by 32Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AICultural Competency in Health Care

Leveraging large language models to foster equity in healthcare

Open access
Rodriguez, Jorge A, Alsentzer, Emily, Bates, David W·2024·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Large language models (LLMs) are poised to change care delivery, but their impact on health equity is unclear. While marginalized populations have been historically excluded from early technology developments, LLMs present an opportunity to change our approach to developing, evaluating, and implementing new technologies. In this perspective, we describe the role of LLMs in supporting health equity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We apply the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) research framework to explore the use of LLMs for health equity. RESULTS: We present opportunities for how LLMs can improve health equity across individual, family and organizational, community, and population health. We describe emerging concerns including biased data, limited technology diffusion, and privacy. Finally, we highlight recommendations focused on prompt engineering, retrieval augmentation, digital inclusion, transparency, and bias mitigation. CONCLUSION: The potential of LLMs to support health equity depends on making health equity a focus from the start.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocae055

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies evaluated LLMs in multiple languages, highlighting a potential role for multilingual LLMs in supporting knowledge transfer and improving access to healthcare information across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts.

    “some studies evaluated LLMs in multiple languages, highlighting a potential role for multilingual LLMs in supporting J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f knowledge transfer and improving access to healthcare information across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts.2”

    From Large Language Models in Pharmacist-Led Direct Patient Care: A Rapid Review of Published Evaluations (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Community health section describes potential LLM support for patient messages in multiple languages, and the section on retrieval augmentation and fine-tuning discusses culturally and linguistically diverse health information. These passages support the proposed role in improving access, but the paper does not report that studies evaluated LLMs in multiple languages or establish the claimed knowledge-transfer role. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys- tems. NIPS'20. Curran Associates Inc.; 2020:9459-9474.
  2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS Framework for Health Equity. Published April 2022. Accessed May 23, 2023. https://www.cms.gov/about-cms/agency-information/omh/health- equity-programs/cms-framework-for-health-equity 32. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. Published October 2022. Accessed May 23, 2023. https:// www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/ 2150 Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2024, Vol. 31, No. 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez, J. A., Alsentzer, E., & Bates, D. W.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez, Jorge A
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2024-03-20
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
2147-2150
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W4394760744
Cited by
32
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (K23MD016439)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
large language models, health equity, health disparities, algorithmic bias, data bias, technology diffusion, privacy, prompt engineering, retrieval augmentation, digital inclusion, transparency, bias mitigation, marginalized communities, health technology development
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Language, United States, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review