Cited by 12Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health Information

A DeepSeek-powered locally deployed closed-loop system for enhancing quality control in electronic nursing documentation: development and clinical validation

Open access
Lv, Jinhong, Xu, Yangyang, Jiang, Mengzhu, Lv, Yuanhao, Sun, Jialu, Lu, Jinming, Wang, Lina, Wang, Hongru·2025·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a locally deployed DeepSeek-powered closed-loop system for electronic nursing documentation quality control (QC) and evaluate its clinical efficacy through a multidimensional validation framework. Materials and Methods: We implemented a three-dimensional (3D) QC framework (real-time, final, and vertical QC). A retrospective analysis of 556 electronic nursing records was conducted to evaluate pre- and postimplementation outcomes, with documentation accuracy and audit efficiency assessed via blinded nurse evaluations. Results: After implementation, omission rates decreased from 7.19% to 1.79%, the prevalence of logical inconsistencies decreased from 9.35% to 0.72%, and the prevalence of timeliness errors decreased from 8.63% to 0%. The QC time per record decreased by 3.2-fold. Nurse satisfaction was evaluated using the Clinical Nursing Information System Effectiveness Evaluation Scale (Zhao Y, Gu Y, Zhang X, et al. Developed the clinical nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and conducted reliability and validity evaluation. Chin J Prae Nurs. 2020;36:544-550. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2020.07.013), yielding a total score of 102.73 ± 3.25 out of a maximum 115 points. Discussion: This study demonstrates that the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered closed-loop QC system significantly enhances documentation accuracy and workflow efficiency while ensuring data security. The 3D framework (real-time, final, and vertical QC) represents a paradigm shift from reactive to proactive quality governance in nursing practice. High nurse satisfaction (102.73/115) confirms clinical viability, offering a scalable model for intelligent health-care quality ecosystems. Future work should explore federated learning for multicenter deployment and regulatory frameworks for clinical AI. Conclusion: DeepSeek demonstrated robust efficacy in enhancing QC accuracy and workflow efficiency, with localized deployment ensuring data security. This system redefines nursing documentation management, heralding an era of “intelligent negative feedback” in health-care quality ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocaf109

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lv, J., Xu, Y., Jiang, M., Lv, Y., Sun, J., Lu, J., Wang, L., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nursing, First People’s Hospital of Xinxiang and The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University , Xinxiang 453003,
  • Henan Medical University (CN)
  • Network and Information Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan Medical University , Xinxiang 453003,
Corresponding author
Wang, Lina
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2025-07-16
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
1526-1532
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W4412488953
Cited by
12
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1
FWCI
27.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Henan Province Postgraduate Education Reform and Quality Improvement Project (YJS2024JD25)
  • Henan Provincial Science and Technology Tackling Project (212102310671)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic nursing documentation, quality control, DeepSeek, large language models, closed-loop systems, documentation accuracy, nursing satisfaction, data security, federated learning
MeSH terms
Documentation, Humans, Nursing Records, Quality Control, Retrospective Studies, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review