Cited by 165Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationGlobal Health Workforce IssuesPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Advancing health equity and access using telemedicine: A geospatial assessment

Open access
Khairat, Saif, Haithcoat, Timothy, Liu, Songzi, Zaman, Tanzila, Edson, Barbara, Gianforcaro, Robert, Shyu, Chi-Ren·2019·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Introduction: Health disparity affects both urban and rural residents, with evidence showing that rural residents have significantly lower health status than urban residents. Health equity is the commitment to reducing disparities in health and in its determinants, including social determinants. Objective: This article evaluates the reach and context of a virtual urgent care (VUC) program on health equity and accessibility with a focus on the rural underserved population. Materials and Methods: We studied a total of 5343 patient activation records and 2195 unique encounters collected from a VUC during the first 4 quarters of operation. Zip codes served as the analysis unit and geospatial analysis and informatics quantified the results. Results: The reach and context were assessed using a mean accumulated score based on 11 health equity and accessibility determinants calculated for each zip code. Results were compared among VUC users, North Carolina (NC), rural NC, and urban NC averages. Conclusions: The study concluded that patients facing inequities from rural areas were enabled better healthcare access by utilizing the VUC. Through geospatial analysis, recommendations are outlined to help improve healthcare access to rural underserved populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jamia/ocz108

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pucher J, Renne JL, Public Policy RU. Differences in mobility and U-R. In: Mode Choice: Evidence From the NHTS 2001. New Brunswick, NJ: Bloustiein School of Public Planning and Policy, Rutgers University; 2004: 1-22.
  2. Stenberg PL. Rural Individuals' Telehealth Practices: An Overview. Eco- nomic Information Bulletin Number 199. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture Economic Research Service; 2018. Available from: https://www.ehidc.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/Rural%20Individ- uals%27%20Telehealth%20Practices.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khairat, S., Haithcoat, T., Liu, S., Zaman, T., Edson, B., Gianforcaro, R., & Shyu, C.-R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Khairat, Saif
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
26
Issue
8-9
Pages
796-805
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2964306065
Cited by
165
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 1
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002489)
  • National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health (5T32LM012410)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
telemedicine, health equity, health disparities, rural and underserved populations, health care access, social determinants of health, urban-rural differences, geospatial analysis, North Carolina
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Ambulatory Care, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, North Carolina, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services, Vulnerable Populations, Healthcare Disparities, Geography, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review