Cited by 32Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationEthics and bioethics in healthcareMedical and Health Sciences Research

Ethics, Guidelines, Standards, and Policy: Telemedicine, COVID-19, and Broadening the Ethical Scope

Open access
Kaplan, Bonnie·2022·Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Abstract

The coronavirus crisis is causing considerable disruption and anguish. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent explosion of telehealth services also provide an unparalleled opportunity to consider ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) beyond immediate needs. Ethicists, informaticians, and others can learn from experience, and evaluate information technology practices and evidence on which to base policy and standards, identify significant values and issues, and revise ethical guidelines. This paper builds on professional organizations’ guidelines and ELSI scholarship to develop emerging concerns illuminated by current experience. Four ethical themes characterized previous literature: quality of care and the doctor–patient relationship, access, consent, and privacy. More attention is needed to these and to expanding the scope of ethical analysis to include health information technologies. An applied ethics approach to ELSI would addresses context-specific issues and the relationships between people and technologies, and facilitate effective and ethical institutionalization of telehealth and other health information technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0963180121000852

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Medical Association. Telehealth Implementation Playbook; 2020; available at https:// www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-04/ama-telehealth-playbook.pdf (last accessed 5 May 2020).
  2. Jack CL, Mars M. Telemedicine a need for ethical and legal guidelines in South Africa. South African Family Practice 2008;50(2):60a-d.
  3. American Medical Association Council on Medical Service. Established patient relationships and telemedicine: CMS Report 1-i-19; 2019; available at https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019- 12/i19-cms-report1-patient-relations-telemedicine.pdf (last accessed 7 May 2020).
  4. American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics opinion 1.2.12; 2019; available at https:// www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/ethical-practice-telemedicine (last accessed 5 May 2020).
  5. Mehta SJ. Telemedicine's potential ethical pitfalls. Virtual Mentor 2014;16(12):1014-7.
  6. Mars M, Jack C. Why is telemedicine a challenge to the regulators? South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 2010;3(2):55-8.
  7. Young JD, Borgetti SA, Clapham PJ. Telehealth: Exploring the ethical issues. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law Spring, 2017;19(3; Symposium):Article 2.
  8. Razon AKAR. The threatened erosion of privacy in healthcare and the search for a "cure:" Pursuing a legal framework for health information privacy in ehealth and telemedicine. Phillipine Law Journal 2017;90:768.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaplan, B.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Bonnie
Venue
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Published
2022-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
105-118
ISSN
  • 0963-1801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2147
OpenAlex
W4205354942
Cited by
32
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
Keywords
telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, ethical, legal and social issues, health information technology, professional ethics guidelines, quality of care, physician-patient relationship, health care access, informed consent, privacy, applied ethics
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Telemedicine, Policy, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review