Cited by 7Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisHistorical and Scientific StudiesPoisoning and overdose treatments

Using Forensic Intelligence as a Model for Determining Future Toxicology Methods: TBI Forensic Toxicology and Forensic Drug Chemistry Nitazene Identification

Open access
Gray, Adam, Douglas, Sarah, Tiller, Michael, Bleakley, Michael·2024·Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Abstract

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) serves all 95 counties of Tennessee, but the data included in this article are primarily focused in Upper East and East Tennessee (the parts of the state included in the eastern time zone). The forensic chemistry (seized drug) unit of the TBI began reporting nitazene analogues in late 2019. The primary analogues found in forensic chemistry cases were isotonitazene and metonitazene. After discussion and review of reporting statistics, the forensic toxicology unit began to monitor for these compounds in toxicology samples by using ion characteristics with the nitazene analogues. Between March 2021 and December 2023, TBI toxicology received 49,639 cases statewide. Of those, 20,105 (40.5%) received toxicology testing. Approximately 95% of TBI toxicology cases are related to Driving Under the Influence (DUI)/motor vehicle–related incidents. Fatal overdoses and cases from the medical examiner office comprise <5% of TBI toxicology caseload. The toxicology section utilizes the SCIEX 3200 Qtrap with a SCIEX Exion LC AC autosampler system to monitor multiple reaction monitoring transition of nitazene analogues. The ion monitoring for two nitazene analogues, isotonitazene and metonitazene, started in March 2021. Ion monitoring should not be construed as a confirmed result but rather as an indication that a drug may be present. A comparison of this data from the forensic toxicology and forensic chemistry units revealed the rise of new drugs that required a more in-depth review to understand the magnitude and scope. This article is also intended to encourage collaboration between forensic toxicology and forensic chemistry (seized drug) units.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jat/bkae035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible to understand the synthesis strategies and potential trafficking routes of nitazenes.

    “and to understand their synthesis strategies and potential trafficking routes [71].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction describes nitazenes found in seized drugs and reports that officers said they were sold as fentanyl or heroin. The Conclusion locates most identified cases in eastern Tennessee, but neither section addresses synthesis strategies or trafficking routes; searches for those terms found no such discussion in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, A., Douglas, S., Tiller, M., & Bleakley, M.
Affiliations
  • Tennessee Bureau of Investigation , 1791 Neals Commerce Ln, Knoxville, TN 37914, USA
  • Tennessee Bureau of Investigation , 901 R.S. Gass Blvd, Nashville, TN 37216, USA
Corresponding author
Douglas, Sarah
Venue
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Published
2024-04-22
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
463-467
ISSN
  • 0146-4760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-2403
OpenAlex
W4395049495
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Analytical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
isotonitazene, forensic toxicology, seized drugs, multiple reaction monitoring, driving under the influence, new psychoactive substances, forensic intelligence
MeSH terms
Humans, Methane, Nitroparaffins, Organothiophosphorus Compounds, Tennessee, Substance Abuse Detection, Forensic Toxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review