Cited by 161Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

Synthesis, Chemical Characterization, and μ-Opioid Receptor Activity Assessment of the Emerging Group of “Nitazene” 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Synthetic Opioids

Open access
Vandeputte, Marthe M., Van Uytfanghe, Katleen, Layle, Nathan K., St. Germaine, Danielle M., Iula, Donna M., Stove, Christophe P.·2021·ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Several 2-benzylbenzimidazole opioids (also referred to as “nitazenes”) recently emerged on the illicit market. The most frequently encountered member, isotonitazene, has been identified in multiple fatalities since its appearance in 2019. Although recent scheduling efforts targeted isotonitazene, many other analogues remain unregulated. Being structurally unrelated to fentanyl, little is known about the harm potential of these compounds. In this study, ten nitazenes and four metabolites were synthesized, analytically characterized via four different techniques, and pharmacologically evaluated using two cell-based β-arrestin2/mini-Gi recruitment assays monitoring μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activation. On the basis of absorption spectra and retention times, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) allowed differentiation between most analogues. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) identified a fragment with m / z 100.11 for 12/14 compounds, which could serve as a basis for MS-based nitazene screening. MOR activity determination confirmed that nitazenes are generally highly active, with potencies and efficacies of several analogues exceeding that of fentanyl. Particularly relevant is the unexpected very high potency of the N -desethylisotonitazene metabolite, rivaling the potency of etonitazene and exceeding that of isotonitazene itself. Supported by its identification in fatalities, this likely has in vivo consequences. These results improve our understanding of this emerging group of opioids by laying out an analytical framework for their detection, as well as providing important new insights into their MOR activation potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00064

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a nitazene analogue even at trace amounts, which could be below the cut-off for detection with NTS, may readily give rise to dangerous opioid effects in unknowing users.

    “the presence of a nitazene analogue even at trace amounts, which could be below the cut-off for detection with NTS, may readily give rise to dangerous opioid effects in (unknowing) users.”

    From Nitazene test strips: a laboratory evaluation (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results & Discussion (page not provided) says even small quantities of nitazenes have high harm potential and calls for highly sensitive detection methods. The Introduction (page not provided) adds that these compounds may occur at very low concentrations and be missed in screening. The paper does not establish a detection cut-off for NTS or show that harmful amounts fall below it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Etodesnitazene has a similar in vitro potency and efficacy as fentanyl.

    “we found e.g. etodesnitazene to have a similar in vitro potency and efficacy as fentanyl [7, 13]”

    From Nitazene test strips: a laboratory evaluation (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    Table 2 (Data and statistical analysis) shows etodesnitazene’s efficacy was close to fentanyl’s in both in vitro assays. Its EC50 values were about four to five times higher, however, indicating lower potency; the paper classifies it among compounds 2–10 times less potent than fentanyl. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brandenberger, H. Die Rolle Des Massenspektrometers Im Toxikologisch-Chemischen Laboratorium. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 1974, 70(1), 31-39.
  2. Sorokin, V. I. Illegal Synthesis of Etonitazene. Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association 1999, 9 (2-3), 20.
  3. Sorokin, V. I.; Ponkratov, K. V.; Drozdov, M. A. Etonitazene Encountered in Moscow. Microgram 1999, 32 (9), 239-244.
  4. Bucha, M.; Eppakayala, L.; Maringanti, T. C. A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Docking for Anti-Inflammatory Activity of 2-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1-(2-(Pyrrolidin-1-Yl)Ethyl)-1H- Benzo[d]Imidazol-5-Amine and 2-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1-((1-Ethylpyrrolidin-2-Yl)Methyl)-1H- Benzo[d]Imidazol-5-Amine. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2018, 4, 321-327.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandeputte, M. M., Van Uytfanghe, K., Layle, N. K., St. Germaine, D. M., Iula, D. M., & Stove, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
  • Cayman Chemical (United States) (US)
  • Forensic Chemistry Division, Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, United States
Corresponding author
Stove, Christophe P.
Venue
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1241-1251
ISSN
1948-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135956040
Cited by
161
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (3S038719)
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (01J15517)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
nitazenes, isotonitazene, etonitazene, opioid metabolites, illicit drug markets, opioid screening
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Benzimidazoles, Chromatography, Liquid, Fentanyl

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review