The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matuszewski, B. K., Constanzer, M. L., & Chavez-Eng, C. M. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac020361s · Cited by 5,335
Thompson, M., Ellison, S. L. R., & Wood, R. (2002) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac200274050835 · Cited by 2,478
Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress
Shah, V. P., Midha, K. K., Findlay, J. W. A., Hill, H. M., Hulse, J. D., McGilveray, I. J., McKay, G., Miller, K. J., Patnaik, R. N., Powell, M. L., et al. (2000) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007669411738 · Cited by 1,572
Peters, F. T., Drummer, O. H., & Musshoff, F. (2007) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.021 · Cited by 1,343
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
(1983) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(01)95433-0 · Cited by 1,302
Viswanathan, C. T., Bansal, S., Booth, B., DeStefano, A. J., Rose, M. J., Sailstad, J., Shah, V. P., Skelly, J. P., Swann, P. G., & Weiner, R. (2007) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-007-9291-7 · Cited by 826
Validation of bioanalytical LC–MS/MS assays: Evaluation of matrix effects
Van Eeckhaut, A., Lanckmans, K., Sarre, S., Smolders, I., & Michotte, Y. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.003 · Cited by 763
Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures
Hubert, P., Nguyen-Huu, J.-J., Boulanger, B., Chapuzet, E., Chiap, P., Cohen, N., Compagnon, P.-A., Dewé, W., Feinberg, M., Lallier, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.06.013 · Cited by 549
Key aspects of analytical method validation and linearity evaluation
Araujo, P. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.09.030 · Cited by 497
Analytical Methods Validation: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies
Shah, V. P., Midha, K. K., Dighe, S., McGilveray, I. J., Skelly, J. P., Yacobi, A., Layloff, T., Viswanathan, C. T., Cook, C. E., McDowall, R. D., et al. (1992) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1015829422034 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Isotonitazene Quantitation and Metabolite Discovery in Authentic Forensic Casework
Krotulski, A. J., Papsun, D. M., Kacinko, S. L., & Logan, B. K. (2020) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkaa016 · Cited by 146
Gotvaldová, K., Hájková, K., Borovička, J., Jurok, R., Cihlářová, P., & Kuchař, M. (2021) · Drug Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1002/dta.2950 · Cited by 67
Schüller, M., Lucic, I., Øiestad, Å. M. L., Pedersen-Bjergaard, S., & Øiestad, E. L. (2023) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkad071 · Cited by 37
Ververi, C., Galletto, M., Massano, M., Alladio, E., Vincenti, M., & Salomone, A. (2024) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2024.115975 · Cited by 34
Jang, M., Lee, M., Chung, S., Park, S.-A., Park, H., Jeon, H., Jegal, J., Park, S. B., Oh, D. X., Shin, G., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172903 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 452-474
- ISSN
- 0146-4760 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-2403
- OpenAlex
- W4254185355
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 40.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jat/bkt054
- The paper
- Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology. (2013). Journal of Analytical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkt054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
