Cited by 9Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsClick Chemistry and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative nascent proteome profiling by dual-pulse labelling with O- propargyl-puromycin and stable isotope-labelled amino acids

Open access
Uchiyama, Junki, Ishihama, Yasushi, Imami, Koshi·2021·The Journal of Biochemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Monitoring translational regulation in response to environmental signals is crucial for understanding cellular proteostasis. However, only limited approaches are currently available for quantifying acute changes in protein synthesis induced by stimuli. Recently, a clickable puromycin analogue, O-propargyl-puromycin (OPP), was developed and applied to label the C-termini of nascent polypeptide chains (NPCs). Following affinity purification via a click reaction, OPP allows for a proteomic analysis of NPCs. Despite its advantage, the affinity purification of NPCs using magnetic beads or resins inherently suffers from significant non-specific protein binding, which hinders accurate quantification of the nascent proteins. To address this issue, we employed dual-pulse labelling of NPCs with both OPP and stable isotope-labelled amino acids to distinguish bona fide NPCs from non-specific proteins, thereby enabling the accurate quantitative profiling of NPCs. We applied this method to dissecting translation responses upon transcriptional inhibition and quantified ∼3,000 nascent proteins. We found that the translation of a subset of ribosomal proteins (e.g. RPSA, RPLP0) as well as signalling proteins (e.g. BCAR3, EFNA1, DUSP1) was significantly repressed by transcription inhibition. Together, the present method provides an accurate and broadly applicable nascent proteome profiling for many biological applications at the level of translation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jb/mvaa104

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Truitt, 2017, New frontiers in translational control of the cancer genome, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 17, 332, 10.1038/nrc.2017.30 · DOI
  2. Selbach, 2008, Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs, Nature, 455, 58, 10.1038/nature07228 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Imami, 2018, Phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein RPL12/uL11 affects translation during mitosis, Mol. Cell, 72, 84, 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.019 · DOI
  4. Howden, 2013, QuaNCAT: quantitating proteome dynamics in primary cells, Nat. Methods, 10, 343, 10.1038/nmeth.2401 · DOI
  5. Dieterich, 2006, Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 103, 9482, 10.1073/pnas.0601637103 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pestka, 1971, Inhibitors of ribosome functions, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 25, 487, 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.002415 · DOI
  7. Aviner, 2013, Novel proteomic approach (PUNCH-P) reveals cell cycle-specific fluctuations in mRNA translation, Genes Dev, 27, 1834, 10.1101/gad.219105.113 · DOI
  8. Forester, 2018, Revealing nascent proteomics in signaling pathways and cell differentiation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 115, 2353, 10.1073/pnas.1707514115 · DOI
  9. Barrett, 2016, Cell-specific profiling of nascent proteomes using orthogonal enzyme-mediated puromycin incorporation, ACS Chem. Biol., 11, 1532, 10.1021/acschembio.5b01076 · DOI
  10. Mellacheruvu, 2013, The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data, Nat. Methods, 10, 730, 10.1038/nmeth.2557 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Imami, 2010, Quantitative proteome and phosphoproteome analyses of cultured cells based on SILAC labeling without requirement of serum dialysis, Mol. Biosyst., 6, 594, 10.1039/b921379a · DOI
  12. Adachi, 2016, Improved proteome and phosphoproteome analysis on a cation exchanger by a combined acid and salt gradient, Anal. Chem., 88, 7899, 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01232 · DOI
  13. Ishihama, 2002, Microcolumns with self-assembled particle frits for proteomics, J. Chromatogr. A, 979, 233, 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01402-4 · DOI
  14. Cox, 2008, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification, Nat. Biotechnol, 26, 1367, 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cox, 2011, Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment, J. Proteome Res., 10, 1794, 10.1021/pr101065j · DOI
  16. Nolte, 2018, Instant clue: a software suite for interactive data visualization and analysis, Sci. Rep., 8, 12648, 10.1038/s41598-018-31154-6 · DOI
  17. Okuda, 2017, jPOSTrepo: an international standard data repository for proteomes, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, D1107, 10.1093/nar/gkw1080 · DOI
  18. Moriya, 2019, The jPOST environment: an integrated proteomics data repository and database, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D1218, 10.1093/nar/gky899 · DOI
  19. Stumpf, 2013, The translational landscape of the mammalian cell cycle, Mol. Cell, 52, 574, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.018 · DOI
  20. Shuda, 2015, CDK1 substitutes for mTOR kinase to activate mitotic cap-dependent protein translation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 112, 5875, 10.1073/pnas.1505787112 · DOI
  21. Imami, 2019, Measuring protein synthesis during cell cycle by azidohomoalanine (AHA) labeling and flow cytometric analysis, Bio-protocol, 9, 1, 10.21769/BioProtoc.3215 · DOI
  22. Ingolia, 2009, Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling, Science, 324, 218, 10.1126/science.1168978 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kohler, 2017, Architecture of a transcribing-translating expressome, Science, 356, 194, 10.1126/science.aal3059 · DOI
  24. Perry, 1970, Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: characteristic dose-response of different RNA species, J. Cell. Physiol., 76, 127, 10.1002/jcp.1040760202 · DOI
  25. Bensaude, 2011, Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity?, Transcription, 2, 103, 10.4161/trns.2.3.16172 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Marciano, 2018, Puromycin labeling does not allow protein synthesis to be measured in energy-starved cells, Cell Death Dis., 9, 39, 10.1038/s41419-017-0056-x · DOI
  27. Lo, 2009, Ribosome stalk assembly requires the dual-specificity phosphatase Yvh1 for the exchange of Mrt4 with P0, J. Cell Biol, 186, 849, 10.1083/jcb.200904110 · DOI
  28. McShane, 2016, Kinetic analysis of protein stability reveals age-dependent degradation, Cell, 167, 803, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015 · DOI
  29. Cooper, 1977, The mechanism by which actinomycin D inhibits protein synthesis in animal cells, Nature, 269, 527, 10.1038/269527a0 · DOI
  30. Cassé, 1999, The transcriptional inhibitors, actinomycin D and alpha-amanitin, activate the HIV-1 promoter and favor phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 16097, 10.1074/jbc.274.23.16097 · DOI
  31. Imamichi, 2005, A transcription inhibitor, actinomycin D, enhances HIV-1 replication through an interleukin-6-dependent pathway, J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr., 40, 388, 10.1097/01.qai.0000179466.25700.2f · DOI
  32. Galluzzi, 2011, Mitochondrial liaisons of p53, Antioxid. Redox Signal, 15, 1691, 10.1089/ars.2010.3504 · DOI
  33. Boulon, 2010, The nucleolus under stress, Mol. Cell, 40, 216, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.024 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Uchiyama, J., Ishihama, Y., & Imami, K.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Ishihama, Yasushi
  • Imami, Koshi
Venue
The Journal of Biochemistry
Published
2020-09-14
Volume
169
Issue
2
Pages
227-236
ISSN
  • 0021-924X (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2651
OpenAlex
W3086887537
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JP18K14674, JP20H03241, JP20H04844, 17H05667)
  • JST PRESTO (JPMJPR18H2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
nascent polypeptide chains, click chemistry, nonspecific protein binding, transcription inhibition, translational regulation, ribosomal proteins, protein synthesis, proteostasis
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, HeLa Cells, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Puromycin, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Biosynthesis, Proteome, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review