The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Networks of Desire: How Technology Increases Our Passion to Consume
Abstract
How is consumer desire transformed by contemporary technology? Most extant theory holds that technology rationalizes and reduces passion. In our investigation of networks of desire—complex open systems of machines, consumers, energy, and objects—we find technology increasing the passion to consume. Effects depend upon participation in the network, which can be private, public, or professional. Private participation tends to discipline passion into interests reflecting established cultural categories. Public and professional participation build new connections between extant desires and a wider network, decentering ties and deterritorializing flows that limit hungers to emplaced bodies. Public and professional participation drive consumption passion to transgressive extremes. We use ethnography and netnography to study online food image sharing, a broad field that includes everything from friend networks to food bloggers. Using and extending Deleuze and Guattari’s desire theory, we conceptualize desire as energetic, connective, systemic, and innovative. Critically examining the role of technocapitalism in the realm of consumption passion, we question the emancipatory possibilities of unfettered desire. Networks of desire create a passionate new universe of technologically enhanced desire, one that challenges the way we think about consumer collectives, capitalism, emancipation, and posthuman consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
GIRARD, R. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.27 · Cited by 2,049
Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1.
Belk, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/671052 · Cited by 1,698
Cited by
Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105 · Cited by 668
Schmitt, B., Brakus, J. J., & Biraglia, A. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab044 · Cited by 119
Airoldi, M., & Rokka, J. (2022) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726 · Cited by 111
Disability in influencer marketing: a complex model of disability representation
Södergren, J., & Vallström, N. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2022.2144418 · Cited by 65
Netnography and design thinking: development and illustration in the vegan food industry
Ashman, R., Patterson, A., & Kozinets, R. V. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2020-0155 · Cited by 44
Self-citationEating One’s Own Otherness: When Producers Commercialize Their Ethnicities
Zanette, M. C., Brito, E. P. Z., Fontenelle, I. A., & de Camargo Heck, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.057 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 659-682
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2529218593
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 42.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.