Cited by 119Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer behavior in food and healthConsumer Behavior and Market Dynamics

Consumption Ideology

Open access
Schmitt, Bernd, Brakus, J Joško, Biraglia, Alessandro·2022·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Ideology plays a central role in consumer decisions, actions, and practices. While there have been numerous studies of ideological formations in specific consumption contexts, an integrative theoretical framework on consumption ideology has been missing. The theoretical framework presented in this article integrates systemic, social group, and social reality perspectives from social theory with prior consumer research to conceptualize consumption ideology as ideas and ideals that are related to consumerism and manifested in consumer behavior. Consumption ideology originates from conflicts between consumer desires and the system of consumerism. It is reflected in consumers’ lived experiences and expressed in social representations and communicative actions related to status-based consumption, brand affinity and antipathy, performed practices, and political consumption. By adapting to the market, consumers confirm the system, but when they resist, they accelerate conflicts in consumer experiences unless resistance is ideologically co-opted by the market. Three illustrative cases—upcycling, Zoom backgrounds, and the commercialization of TikTok—exemplify how the framework may be used to analyze consumption ideology and generate new research questions. The article concludes with future research programs that move beyond micro-theorizations to illuminate the broader role of ideology in contemporary consumerist society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcr/ucab044

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumer self-authorization epitomizes an ongoing dynamic between reconcilement and activism or woke capitalism, in its ambivalent attempt to reinscribe the resurgent politics of cultural diversity within the dominant logic of the market.

    “Seen in this light, consumer self-authorization epitomizes what Schmitt, Brakus, and Biraglia (2022, 84) describe as an ongoing 'dynamic between reconcilement and activism' or what Kanai and Gill (2020, 10) refer to as 'woke capitalism,' in its ambivalent attempt to reinscribe the resurgent politics of cultural diversity within the dominant logic of the market.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, B., Brakus, J. J., & Biraglia, A.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Brakus, J Joško
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
74-95
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W4210449821
Cited by
119
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
Keywords
consumption ideology, consumerism, consumer behavior, consumer resistance, brand affinity, political consumerism, social representations, upcycling, consumer desire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review