Consumption Ideology
Open accessAbstract
Ideology plays a central role in consumer decisions, actions, and practices. While there have been numerous studies of ideological formations in specific consumption contexts, an integrative theoretical framework on consumption ideology has been missing. The theoretical framework presented in this article integrates systemic, social group, and social reality perspectives from social theory with prior consumer research to conceptualize consumption ideology as ideas and ideals that are related to consumerism and manifested in consumer behavior. Consumption ideology originates from conflicts between consumer desires and the system of consumerism. It is reflected in consumers’ lived experiences and expressed in social representations and communicative actions related to status-based consumption, brand affinity and antipathy, performed practices, and political consumption. By adapting to the market, consumers confirm the system, but when they resist, they accelerate conflicts in consumer experiences unless resistance is ideologically co-opted by the market. Three illustrative cases—upcycling, Zoom backgrounds, and the commercialization of TikTok—exemplify how the framework may be used to analyze consumption ideology and generate new research questions. The article concludes with future research programs that move beyond micro-theorizations to illuminate the broader role of ideology in contemporary consumerist society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumer self-authorization epitomizes an ongoing dynamic between reconcilement and activism or woke capitalism, in its ambivalent attempt to reinscribe the resurgent politics of cultural diversity within the dominant logic of the market.
“Seen in this light, consumer self-authorization epitomizes what Schmitt, Brakus, and Biraglia (2022, 84) describe as an ongoing 'dynamic between reconcilement and activism' or what Kanai and Gill (2020, 10) refer to as 'woke capitalism,' in its ambivalent attempt to reinscribe the resurgent politics of cultural diversity within the dominant logic of the market.”
From Between Cultural Appreciation and Cultural Appropriation: Self-Authorizing the Consumption of Cultural Difference (2024) · cites this paper as Schmitt, Brakus, and Biraglia 2022
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064 · see citing works
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity
Giesler, M., & Veresiu, E. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/677842 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/644761 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Arsel, Z., & Thompson, C. J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656389 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Ordabayeva, N., & Fernandes, D. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy004 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Indigenes’ Responses to Immigrants’ Consumer Acculturation: A Relational Configuration Analysis
Luedicke, M. K. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv002 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y., & Scaraboto, D. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad022 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmitt, B., Brakus, J. J., & Biraglia, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brakus, J Joško
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-08-27
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-95
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W4210449821
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
- Keywords
- consumption ideology, consumerism, consumer behavior, consumer resistance, brand affinity, political consumerism, social representations, upcycling, consumer desire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review