Cited by 668Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAI in Service Interactions

Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach

Hoffman, Donna L, Novak, Thomas P·2018·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

The consumer Internet of Things (IoT) has the potential to revolutionize consumer experience. Because consumers can actively interact with smart objects, the traditional, human-centric conceptualization of consumer experience as consumers’ internal subjective responses to branded objects may not be sufficient to conceptualize consumer experience in the IoT. Smart objects possess their own unique capacities and their own kinds of experiences in interaction with the consumer and each other. A conceptual framework based on assemblage theory and object-oriented ontology details how consumer experience and object experience emerge in the IoT. This conceptualization is anchored in the context of consumer-object assemblages, and defines consumer experience by its emergent properties, capacities, and agentic and communal roles expressed in interaction. Four specific consumer experience assemblages emerge: enabling experiences, comprising agentic self-extension and communal self-expansion, and constraining experiences, comprising agentic self-restriction and communal self-reduction. A parallel conceptualization of the construct of object experience argues that it can be accessed by consumers through object-oriented anthropomorphism, a nonhuman-centric approach to evaluating the expressive roles objects play in interaction. Directions for future research are derived, and consumer researchers are invited to join a dialogue about the important themes underlying our framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcr/ucx105

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IoT may impose constraints and restrictions on consumer journeys.

    “IoT may impose constraints and restrictions on consumer journeys (Hoffman and Novak 2018; Novak and Hoffman 2019).”

    From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Hoffman and Novak 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Donna L
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2017-10-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1178-1204
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W3124255990
Cited by
668
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
66.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
Internet of Things, customer experience, assemblage theory, object-oriented ontology, smart objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review