Cited by 144Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect Resistance and GeneticsInsect Pest Control Strategies

Bt Sweet Corn and Selective Insecticides: Impacts on Pests and Predators

Musser, Fred R., Shelton, Anthony M.·2003·Journal of Economic Entomology

Abstract

Sweet corn, Zea mays L., is attacked by a variety of insect pests that can cause severe losses to the producer. Current control practices are largely limited to the application of broad-spectrum insecticides that can have a substantial and deleterious impact on the natural enemy complex. Predators have been shown to provide partial control of sweet corn pests when not killed by broad-spectrum insecticides. New products that specifically target the pest species, while being relatively benign to other insects, could provide more integrated control. In field trials we found that transgenic Bt sweet corn, and the foliar insecticides indoxacarb and spinosad are all less toxic to the most abundant predators in sweet corn (Coleomegilla maculata [DeGeer], Harmonia axyridis [Pallas], and Orius insidiosus [Say]) than the pyrethroid lambda cyhalothrin. Indoxacarb, however, was moderately toxic to coccinellids and spinosad and indoxacarb were somewhat toxic to O. insidiosus nymphs at field rates. Bt sweet corn and spinosad were able to provide control of the lepidopteran pests better than or equal to lambda cyhalothrin. The choice of insecticide material made a significant impact on survival of the pests and predators, while the frequency of application mainly affected the pests and the rate applied had little effect on either pests or predators. These results demonstrate that some of the new products available in sweet corn allow a truly integrated biological and chemical pest control program in sweet corn, making future advances in conservation, augmentation and classical biological control more feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jee/96.1.71

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For microbial insecticides, the effect can be linked to one study that used spinosad.

    “In the case of microbial insecticides, the effect can be linked to one study that used spinosad [58]”
  • The use of insecticides for Bt targeted pests in non-Bt crops can significantly reduce biological control function.

    “In contrast, the use of insecticides for Bt targeted pests in non-Bt crops can significantly reduce biological control function (Musser and Shelton, 2003;Rose, 2005).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Musser and Shelton, 2003

  • Bt sweet corn provides better control of lepidopteran pests than lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb.

    “Furthermore, this study demonstrated that Bt sweet corn provided better control of lepidopteran pests, and did not negatively affect the predation rates of sentinel egg masses of the European corn borer, as did lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb.”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Musser and Shelton, 2003

  • In the northeastern US, Bt sweet corn is far less toxic to the major predators C. maculata, H. axyridis, and Orius insidiosus than the commonly used pyrethroid lambda cyhalothrin, spinosad, and indoxacarb.

    “In the northeastern US where a considerable amount of sweet corn is grown, studies have shown that Bt sweet corn is far less toxic to the major predators in the system (ladybeetles C. maculata and H. axyridis and the minute pirate bug, Orius insidiosus [Hemiptera: Anthocoridae]), than the commonly used pyrethroid lambda cyhalothrin, spinosad, and indoxacarb (Musser and Shelton, 2003).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Musser and Shelton, 2003

  • Bt sweet corn does not negatively affect predation rates of sentinel egg masses of the European corn borer, whereas lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb do.

    “Furthermore, this study demonstrated that Bt sweet corn provided better control of lepidopteran pests, and did not negatively affect the predation rates of sentinel egg masses of the European corn borer, as did lambda cyhalothrin and indoxacarb.”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Musser and Shelton, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musser, F. R., & Shelton, A. M.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Musser, Fred R.
Venue
Journal of Economic Entomology
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
71-80
ISSN
  • 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-291X
OpenAlex
W2176466349
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
selective insecticides, indoxacarb, spinosad, lambda-cyhalothrin, predators, Harmonia axyridis, Orius insidiosus, Coccinellidae, lepidopteran pests, insecticide toxicity, integrated pest management, biological control, conservation biological control, classical biological control
MeSH terms
Animals, Aphids, Coleoptera, Zea mays, Drug Combinations, Insecticides, Larva, Lepidoptera, Ovum, Oxazines, Pest Control, Macrolides, Heteroptera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review