Value of neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments in Mid-South cotton (Gossypium hirsutum [Malvales: Malvaceae]) production systems
Abstract
Neonicotinoid insecticides are currently one of two classes of chemicals available as a seed treatment for growers to manage early season insect pests of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Malvales: Malvaceae), and they are used on nearly 100% of cotton hectares in the midsouthern states. An analysis was performed on 100 seed-treatment trials from Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee to determine the value of neonicotinoid seed treatments in cotton production systems. The analysis compared seed treated with neonicotinoid insecticides seed treatments plus a fungicide with seed only treated with fungicide. When analyzed by state, cotton yields were significantly greater when neonicotinoid seed treatments were used compared with fungicide-only treatments. Cotton treated with neonicotinoid seed treatments yielded 123, 142, 95, and 104 kg ha-1, higher than fungicide only treatments for Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee, respectively. Across all states, neonicotinoid seed treatments provided an additional 115 kg lint ha-1 comparedwith fungicide only treated seed. Average net returns from cotton with a neonicotinoid seed treatment were $1,801 per ha-1 compared with $1,660 per ha-1 for cottonseed treated with fungicide only. Economic returns for cotton with neonicotinoid seed treatments were significantly greater than cottonseed treated with fungicide only in 8 out of 15 yr representing every state. These data show that neonicotinoid seed treatments provide significant yield and economic benefits in Mid-South cotton compared with fungicide only treated seed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the USA, neonicotinoid seed-treatments for cotton are common in some production regions, where they can provide economic control of thrips during seedling establishment.
“In the USA, neonicitinoid seed-treatments for cotton is common in some production regions (Allen et al., 2018;North et al., 2018;Toews et al., 2010), where it can provide economic control of thrips during the seedling establishment period (North et al., 2018).”
From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as North et al., 2018
Cites
Concept for Monitoring the Growth and Development of Cotton Plants Using Main‐Stem Node Counts
Bourland, F. M., Oosterhuis, D. M., & Tugwell, N. P. (1992) · jpa · doi:10.2134/jpa1992.0532 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production
Brown, D. C. (2000) · Agricultural History · doi:10.1215/00021482-74.4.823 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Cook, D. R., Herbert, A. D., Akin, D. S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1603/ipm10024 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationHuseth, A. S., Chappell, T. M., Langdon, K. W., et al. (2016) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4232 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Insect Pests of Farm, Garden and Orchard
Davidson, R. H. (1956) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-195608000-00015 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Gipson, J. R., & Joham, H. E. (1968) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000030015x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Reisig, D. D., Herbert, D. A., & Malone, S. (2012) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec11429 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gaines, J. C. (1934) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/27.4.740 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Cook, D. R., Allen, C. T., Burris, E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Entomological Science · doi:10.18474/0749-8004-38.4.669 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationInsect Pests of Farm, Garden, and Orchard
Bray, D. F. (1980) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/26.2.139 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Survey of thrips species infesting cotton across the southern U.S. Cotton Belt.
Stewart, S. D., Akin, D. S., Reed, J., et al. (2013) · The journal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationDunnam, E. W., & Clark, J. (1937) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/30.6.855 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Control of Several Cotton Pests with Systemic Insecticides12
Davis, J. W., Watkins, W. C., Cowan, C. B., et al. (1966) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/59.1.159 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Performance of GAUCHO™ seed treatment insecticide against early season cotton insect pests.
Graham, C., Jenkins, J. N., & McCarty, J. C. (1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Identification of Thrips Species on Cotton on the Texas Rolling Plains
Albeldaño, W. A., Slosser, J. E., & Parajulee, M. N. (2008) · Southwestern Entomologist · doi:10.3958/0147-1724-33.1.43 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Parker, R. D., Knutson, A. E., Jungman, M. J., et al. (2008) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Field Evaluation of Three Formulations of Aldicarb for Control of Cotton Insects12
Davis, J. W., & Cowan, C. B. (1972) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/65.1.231 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Virginia Cotton Production Guide 2010
Herbert, D. A., Horton, D. N., Phipps, P. M., et al. (2008) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Early-season insect control: AdageTM vs recommended standards.
Lentz, G. L., van Tol, N. B., Dugger, P., et al. (2000) · 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, USA, 4-8 January, 2000: Volume 2. · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Siders, K., Baugh, B. A., Sansone, C., et al. (2008) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Suggested Insecticides for Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley - 2008
Cattaneo, M., & Kerns, D. L. (2008) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“2010), where it can provide economic control of thrips during the seedling establishment period (North et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFrequency and abundance of selected early-season insect pests of cotton
Allen, K. C., Luttrell, R. G., Sappington, T. W., Hesler, L. S., & Papiernik, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Integrated Pest Management · doi:10.1093/jipm/pmy010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- North, J. H., Gore, J., Catchot, A. L., Stewart, S. D., Lorenz, G. M., Musser, F. R., Cook, D. R., Kerns, D. L., & Dodds, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Mississippi State University (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- University of Arkansas System (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- North, J H
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-15
- ISSN
- 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-291X
- OpenAlex
- W2779176812
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Keywords
- neonicotinoids, seed treatment, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, fungicides, cotton yield, economic returns, Mid-South United States
- MeSH terms
- Crop Protection, Neonicotinoids, Arkansas, Gossypium, Fungicides, Industrial, Insect Control, Insecticides, Louisiana, Mississippi, Seeds, Tennessee
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review