Quantifying conservation biological control for management of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in cotton
Open accessAbstract
Conservation biological control can be an effective tactic for minimizing insect-induced damage to agricultural production. In the Arizona cotton system, a suite of generalist arthropod predators provides critical regulation of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (MEAM1) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and other pests. Arthropod predator and B. tabaci populations were manipulated with a range of broad-spectrum and selective insecticide exclusions to vary predator to prey interactions in a 2-yr field study. Predator to prey ratios associated with B. tabaci densities near the existing action threshold were estimated for six predator species found to be negatively associated with either adult and/or large nymphs of B. tabaci [Misumenops celer (Hentz) (Araneae: Thomisidae), Drapetis nr divergens (Diptera: Empididae), Geocoris pallens Stäl (Hemiptera: Geocoridae), Orius tristicolor (White) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Chrysoperla carnea s.l. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and Collops spp. (Coleoptera: Melyridae)] with the first three most consistently associated with declining B. tabaci densities. Ratios ranged from 1 M. celer per 100 sweeps to 1 B. tabaci adult per leaf to 44 D. nr. divergens per 100 sweeps to 1 large nymph per leaf disk. These ratios represent biological control informed thresholds that might serve as simple-to-use decision tool for reducing risk in the current B. tabaci integrated pest management strategy. The identification of key predators within the large, flexible food web of the cotton agro-ecosystem and estimation of predator to B. tabaci ratios clarifies the role of key predators in B. tabaci suppression, yielding potential decision-making advantages that could contribute to further improving economic and environmental sustainability of insect management in the cotton system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive experimental work documented the role of natural enemies generally and their conservation specifically in the suppression and economic management of B. tabaci.
“Extensive experimental work documented the role of natural enemies generally and their conservation specifically in the suppression and economic management of B. tabaci (Asiimwe et al., 2016;Naranjo andEllsworth, 2005, 2009b;Vandervoet et al., 2018).”
From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Vandervoet et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Community structure, population control, and competition.
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., & Slobodkin, L. B. (1960) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282146 · Cited by 3,492 · see citing works
Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination (version 5.0)
ter Braak, C. J. F., & Šmilauer, P. (2012) · Cited by 1,898 · see citing works
Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.
Sih, A., Englund, G., & Wooster, D. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01437-2 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosch, R., & Hagen, K. S. (1959) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v29n02p081 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
den Brink, P. J. V., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (1999) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620180207 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci
Oliveira, M. R. V., Henneberry, T. J., & Anderson, P. K. (2001) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/s0261-2194(01)00108-9 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Dinsdale, A., Cook, L. G., Riginos, C., Buckley, Y. M., & Barro, P. D. (2010) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1603/an09061 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Polis, G. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546565 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Losey, J. E., & Denno, R. F. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2143:pppiep]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Insecticidal control and resistance management for Bemisia tabaci
Palumbo, J. C., Horowitz, A. R., & Prabhaker, N. (2001) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/s0261-2194(01)00117-x · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Ives, A. R., Cardinale, B. J., & Snyder, W. E. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00698.x · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Rosenheim, J., Wilhoit, L., & Armer, C. A. (1993) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317517 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Economic Value of Biological Control in Integrated Pest Management of Managed Plant Systems
Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Frisvold, G. B. (2014) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Self-citationTheory for Biological Control: Recent Developments
Murdoch, W. W., & Briggs, C. J. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265696 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
IPM for Bemisia tabaci: a case study from North America
Ellsworth, P. C., & Martínez-Carrillo, J. L. (2001) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/s0261-2194(01)00116-8 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationden Brink, P. J. V., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (1998) · Aquatic Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1009944004756 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Naranjo, S. E., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1861 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralist and Specialist Natural Enemies in Insect Predator-Prey Interactions
Hassell, M. P., & May, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4425 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Mortality dynamics and population regulation inBemisia tabaci
Naranjo, S. E., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2005) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00297.x · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationNaranjo, S. E., & Flint, H. M. (1995) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/24.2.261 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationNaranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Hagler, J. R. (2003) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.09.010 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationNaranjo, S. E., & Flint, H. M. (1994) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/23.2.254 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationRosenheim, J., Limburg, D., & Colfer, R. G. (1999) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0409:iogpoa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
McIntosh, A. H., Grasela, J. J., Lua, L. H. L., et al. (2004) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1673/031.004.3101 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Naranjo, S. E., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.08.006 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationProperties and applications of pyrethroids.
Elliott, M. L. (1976) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.76141 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Giles, K. L., Jones, D. B., Royer, T. A., et al. (2003) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-0493-96.3.975 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Hagler, J. R., & Naranjo, S. E. (2005) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583150500086474 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationProperties and Applications of Pyrethroids
Elliott, M. (1976) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.2307/3428357 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Roditakis, E. N., Fytrou, N., Staurakaki, M., et al. (2014) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3723 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Identifying inter‐ and intra‐guild feeding activity of an arthropod predator assemblage
Hagler, J. R., & Blackmer, F. (2013) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.12014 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Leigh, T. F., Kerby, T. A., & Wynholds, P. F. (1988) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/81.5.1328 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Giles, K. L., Jones, D. B., Royer, T. A., et al. (2003) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/96.3.975 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Hallett, R. H., Bahlai, C. A., Xue, Y., et al. (2013) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3674 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Incorporating biological control into IPM decision making
Giles, K. L., McCornack, B. P., Royer, T. A., et al. (2017) · Current Opinion in Insect Science · doi:10.1016/j.cois.2017.03.009 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Action Thresholds for the Management of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Cotton
Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., Chu, C. C., et al. (1998) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/91.6.1415 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationShakya, S., Coll, M., & Weintraub, P. G. (2010) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec09373 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Walker, G. P., Herman, T. J. B., Kale, A. J., et al. (2009) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.09.003 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hamilton, A. J., Schellhorn, N. A., Endersby, N. M., et al. (2004) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/97.1.127 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Conway, H. E., Steinkraus, D. C., Ruberson, J. R., et al. (2006) · Journal of Entomological Science · doi:10.18474/0749-8004-41.4.361 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Hallett, R. H., Bahlai, C. A., Xue, Y., et al. (2014) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3858 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Hoffmann, M. P., Wilson, L. T., Zalom, F. G., et al. (1990) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/19.3.753 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Whitefly Management in Arizona Cotton 2006
Ellsworth, P. C., Palumbo, J. C., Naranjo, S. E., et al. (2006) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationHagler, J. R., Jackson, C. G., Isaacs, R., et al. (2004) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1673/031.004.0101 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Incorporating Pest Survivorship into Economic Thresholds
Ostlie, K. R., & Pedigo, L. P. (1987) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/33.2.98 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Asiimwe, P., Naranjo, S. E., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2013) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec12182 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationHagler (2002) · Southwestern Entomologist · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ellsworth, P. C., and V. Barkley. 2001. Cost-effective Lygus management in Arizona cotton, pp. 299-307.
- In J. C. Silvertooth (ed.), Cotton, A CALS Report. Publ. No. AZ1224. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. http://hdl. handle.net/10150/211330
- Frisvold, G. B., R. E. Tronstad, R. L. Nichols, M. D. Watson, and E. F. Hequet. 2007. Scope and economic effect of sticky cotton, pp. 5-31. In E. Hequet, T. J. Henneberry, and R. L. Nichols (eds.), Sticky cotton: causes, effects, and prevention. Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin 1915.
- Hagen, K. S., E. F. Sawall, Jr., and R. L. Tassan. 1971. The use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects. Proc. Tall Timb. Conf. Ecol Anim. Contr. Habitat Mgmt. 2: 59-81.
- Naranjo, S. E., and E. Hequet. 2007. Sticky cotton sampling, pp. 148-165.
- In E. Hequet, T. J. Henneberry, and R. L. Nichols (eds.), Sticky cotton: causes, effects, and prevention. Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin 1915.
- Ramsey, F. L., and D. W. Shafer. 2002. The statistical sleuth: A course in meth- ods and data analysis. Duxbury Press, New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vandervoet, T. F., Ellsworth, P. C., Carrière, Y., & Naranjo, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Naranjo, Steven E
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-13
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1056-1068
- ISSN
- 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-291X
- OpenAlex
- W2790673959
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (# 2012-41530-20180)
- Western IPM Center (# 2012-51120-20087)
- Extension IPM Program (# 2013-41534-21088)
- Extension Implementation Program (# 2014-70006-22488)
- Arizona Pest Management Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hemiptera Insect Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Keywords
- conservation biological control, Bemisia tabaci, cotton whitefly, predatory arthropods, predator-prey ratio, Orius tristicolor, Chrysoperla carnea, integrated pest management, Arizona cotton
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arizona, Conservation of Natural Resources, Gossypium, Decision Making, Hemiptera, Insecticides, Pest Control, Biological, Population Density, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review