The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
Open accessAbstract
There is a long-standing controversy as to whether drought limits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation through stomatal closure or by metabolic impairment in C3 plants. Comparing results from different studies is difficult due to interspecific differences in the response of photosynthesis to leaf water potential and/or relative water content (RWC), the most commonly used parameters to assess the severity of drought. Therefore, we have used stomatal conductance (g) as a basis for comparison of metabolic processes in different studies. The logic is that, as there is a strong link between g and photosynthesis (perhaps co-regulation between them), so different relationships between RWC or water potential and photosynthetic rate and changes in metabolism in different species and studies may be 'normalized' by relating them to g. Re-analysing data from the literature using light-saturated g as a parameter indicative of water deficits in plants shows that there is good correspondence between the onset of drought-induced inhibition of different photosynthetic sub-processes and g. Contents of ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) decrease early in drought development, at still relatively high g (higher than 150 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)). This suggests that RuBP regeneration and ATP synthesis are impaired. Decreased photochemistry and Rubisco activity typically occur at lower g (<100 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)), whereas permanent photoinhibition is only occasional, occurring at very low g (<50 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)). Sub-stomatal CO2 concentration decreases as g becomes smaller, but increases again at small g. The analysis suggests that stomatal closure is the earliest response to drought and the dominant limitation to photosynthesis at mild to moderate drought. However, in parallel, progressive down-regulation or inhibition of metabolic processes leads to decreased RuBP content, which becomes the dominant limitation at severe drought, and thereby inhibits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity
Wong, S. C., Cowan, I. R., & Farquhar, G. D. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/282424a0 · Cited by 1,406
Tardieu, F. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.419 · Cited by 1,329
Effects of Water Deficits on Carbon Assimilation
CHAVES, M. M. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/42.1.1 · Cited by 1,113
Photoinhibition of photosynthesis : from molecular mechanisms to the field
Baker, N. R., & Bowyer, J. R. (1994) · Cited by 1,029
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
Photosynthesis and the Environment
(1996) · Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration · doi:10.1007/0-306-48135-9 · Cited by 972
Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP.
Tezara, W., Mitchell, V. J., Driscoll, S. D., & Lawlor, D. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44842 · Cited by 941
Cornic, G. (2000) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01625-3 · Cited by 832
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701
Self-citation
Cited by
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citationBaldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
Metadata
- Authors
- FLEXAS, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-189
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2160906348
- Cited by
- 1,645
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mcf027
- The paper
- FLEXAS, J. (2002). Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.