Cited by 39Genetic diversity and population structureEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Natural history collections as a resource for conservation genomics: Understanding the past to preserve the future

Open access
Benham, Phred M, Bowie, Rauri C K·2023·Journal of Heredity

Abstract

To avoid the worst outcomes of the current biodiversity crisis we need a deep understanding of population responses to human-induced ecological change. Rapidly expanding access to genomic resources for nonmodel taxa promises to play a unique role in meeting this goal. In particular, the increasing feasibility of sequencing DNA from historical specimens enables direct measures of population responses to the past century of anthropogenic change that will inform management strategies and refine projections of species responses to future environmental change. In this review, we discuss the methods that can be used to generate genome-scale data from the hundreds of millions of specimens housed in natural history collections around the world. We then highlight recent studies that utilize genomic data from specimens to address questions of fundamental importance to biodiversity conservation. Finally, we emphasize how traditional motivations of museum collectors, such as studies of geographic variation and community-wide inventories, provide unique opportunities for broad scale comparisons of genomic responses to anthropogenic change across time. We conclude that as sequencing technologies become increasingly accessible and more researchers take advantage of this resource, the importance of collections to the conservation of biodiversity will continue to grow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jhered/esac066

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps.

    “Sampling difficulties are often exacerbated by the costs of fieldwork, specimen curation, and genome sequencing, but newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps (e.g., Card et al. 2021; Raxworthy and Smith 2021; Benham and Bowie 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benham, P. M., & Bowie, R. C. K.
Affiliations
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
Corresponding author
Benham, Phred M
Venue
Journal of Heredity
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
114
Issue
4
Pages
367-384
ISSN
  • 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7333
OpenAlex
W4311287122
Cited by
39
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
natural history collections, conservation genomics, historical specimens, anthropogenic change, biodiversity conservation, regional variation, species inventory, museum collections
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Humans, Museums, Genome, Genomics, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review