Natural history collections as a resource for conservation genomics: Understanding the past to preserve the future
Open accessAbstract
To avoid the worst outcomes of the current biodiversity crisis we need a deep understanding of population responses to human-induced ecological change. Rapidly expanding access to genomic resources for nonmodel taxa promises to play a unique role in meeting this goal. In particular, the increasing feasibility of sequencing DNA from historical specimens enables direct measures of population responses to the past century of anthropogenic change that will inform management strategies and refine projections of species responses to future environmental change. In this review, we discuss the methods that can be used to generate genome-scale data from the hundreds of millions of specimens housed in natural history collections around the world. We then highlight recent studies that utilize genomic data from specimens to address questions of fundamental importance to biodiversity conservation. Finally, we emphasize how traditional motivations of museum collectors, such as studies of geographic variation and community-wide inventories, provide unique opportunities for broad scale comparisons of genomic responses to anthropogenic change across time. We conclude that as sequencing technologies become increasingly accessible and more researchers take advantage of this resource, the importance of collections to the conservation of biodiversity will continue to grow.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps.
“Sampling difficulties are often exacerbated by the costs of fieldwork, specimen curation, and genome sequencing, but newfound efficacy with the sequencing of genomes from preserved museum specimens promises to soon fill many populational gaps (e.g., Card et al. 2021; Raxworthy and Smith 2021; Benham and Bowie 2023).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Benham and Bowie 2023
Cites
The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., & Sexton, J. O. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246752 · Cited by 3,542 · see citing works
Accelerating extinction risk from climate change
Urban, M. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4984 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906 · see citing works
Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians
Wake, D. B., & Vredenburg, V. T. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801921105 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture
Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M., & Wilson, J. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.109 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Gillespie, J. (2004) · doi:10.56021/9780801880087 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benham, P. M., & Bowie, R. C. K.
- Affiliations
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benham, Phred M
- Venue
- Journal of Heredity
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-12-13
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-384
- ISSN
- 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7333
- OpenAlex
- W4311287122
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- natural history collections, conservation genomics, historical specimens, anthropogenic change, biodiversity conservation, regional variation, species inventory, museum collections
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Humans, Museums, Genome, Genomics, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review