Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Adaptive Radiations Across Space, Time, and Taxa

Open access
Gillespie, Rosemary G, Bennett, Gordon M, De Meester, Luc, Feder, Jeffrey L, Fleischer, Robert C, Harmon, Luke J, Hendry, Andrew P, Knope, Matthew L, Mallet, James, Martin, Christopher, Parent, Christine E, Patton, Austin H, Pfennig, Karin S, Rubinoff, Daniel, Schluter, Dolph, Seehausen, Ole, Shaw, Kerry L, Stacy, Elizabeth, Stervander, Martin, Stroud, James T, Wagner, Catherine, Wogan, Guinevere O U·2020·Journal of Heredity

Abstract

Adaptive radiation plays a fundamental role in our understanding of the evolutionary process. However, the concept has provoked strong and differing opinions concerning its definition and nature among researchers studying a wide diversity of systems. Here, we take a broad view of what constitutes an adaptive radiation, and seek to find commonalities among disparate examples, ranging from plants to invertebrate and vertebrate animals, and remote islands to lakes and continents, to better understand processes shared across adaptive radiations. We surveyed many groups to evaluate factors considered important in a large variety of species radiations. In each of these studies, ecological opportunity of some form is identified as a prerequisite for adaptive radiation. However, evolvability, which can be enhanced by hybridization between distantly related species, may play a role in seeding entire radiations. Within radiations, the processes that lead to speciation depend largely on (1) whether the primary drivers of ecological shifts are (a) external to the membership of the radiation itself (mostly divergent or disruptive ecological selection) or (b) due to competition within the radiation membership (interactions among members) subsequent to reproductive isolation in similar environments, and (2) the extent and timing of admixture. These differences translate into different patterns of species accumulation and subsequent patterns of diversity across an adaptive radiation. Adaptive radiations occur in an extraordinary diversity of different ways, and continue to provide rich data for a better understanding of the diversification of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jhered/esz064

Cites

220 of 220 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 220 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Gillespie, R. G., Bennett, G. M., De Meester, L., Feder, J. L., Fleischer, R. C., Harmon, L. J., Hendry, A. P., Knope, M. L., Mallet, J., Martin, C., Parent, C. E., Patton, A. H., Pfennig, K. S., Rubinoff, D., Schluter, D., Seehausen, O., Shaw, K. L., Stacy, E., Stervander, M., Stroud, J. T., Wagner, C., & Wogan, G. O. U.
Venue
Journal of Heredity
Published
2020-01
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7333
OpenAlex
W3001532525
Cited by
285
References
220
FWCI
19.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Adaptive Radiations Across Space, Time, and Taxa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jhered/esz064
The paper
Gillespie, R. G., Bennett, G. M., De Meester, L., Feder, J. L., Fleischer, R. C., Harmon, L. J., Hendry, A. P., Knope, M. L., Mallet, J., Martin, C., Parent, C. E., Patton, A. H., Pfennig, K. S., Rubinoff, D., Schluter, D., Seehausen, O., Shaw, K. L., Stacy, E., Stervander, M., . . . Wogan, G. O. U. (2020). Comparing Adaptive Radiations Across Space, Time, and Taxa. Journal of Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esz064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.