Cited by 21Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlInsect Pest Control StrategiesHemiptera Insect Studies

Overview: Risk factors and historic levels of pressure from insect pests of seedling corn, cotton, soybean, and wheat in the United States

Open access
Papiernik, Sharon K, Sappington, Thomas W, Luttrell, Randall G, Hesler, Louis S, Allen, K Clint·2018·Journal of Integrated Pest Management

Abstract

Abstract The use of neonicotinoid insecticides in the United States has grown by about a factor of four since the mid-2000s. Seed treatments account for a significant fraction of overall insecticide application to crops, and a large proportion of major U.S. crops are now planted using seed treated with neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoid insecticidal seed treatments are primarily intended to protect crops against sporadic or minor early-season pests. A better understanding of factors that influence the risk of economic infestations and extent of crop damage by sporadic pests is needed to target neonicotinoid insecticidal seed treatments use based on expected pest pressure. In a series of papers, we review the distribution, ecology, and historical management of seed and seedling pests targeted by neonicotinoid seed treatments in U.S. corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). This information is key to region-specific management practices that reduce the risks and increase the benefits of neonicotinoid seed treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jipm/pmx026

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of seed treated with various neonicotinoids has become pervasive in several field crops in the USA and potentially negates to some degree the reduction in insecticides possible through the deployment of Bt crops.

    “The use of seed treated with various neonicitinoids has become pervasive in several field crops in the USA (Douglas and Tooker, 2015;Papiernik et al., 2018) and potentially negates to some degree the reduction in insecticides possible through the deployment of Bt crops.”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Papiernik et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papiernik, S. K., Sappington, T. W., Luttrell, R. G., Hesler, L. S., & Allen, K. C.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Papiernik, Sharon K
Venue
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2155-7470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896692304
Cited by
21
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Integrated Pest Management (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hemiptera Insect Studies
Keywords
neonicotinoids, seed treatment, seedling pests, maize, cotton, soybean, wheat, pest ecology, pest control, integrated pest management, crop damage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review