The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspectives
Abstract
The public bureaucracy is a puzzle. How is it that an organizational form that is so widely used is also believed to be inefficient - both in relation to a hypothetical ideal and in comparison with private bureaucracies? This article examines public bureaucracy through the lens of transaction cost economics, according to which the public bureaucracy, like other alternative modes of governance, is well suited to some transactions and poorly suited to others. Rather than proceed in a completely general way, I focus on what James Q. Wilson describes as 'sovereign transactions', of which foreign affairs is an example. I ask what it is that distinguishes sovereign transactions, after which I compare the efficacy of public and private bureaucracies for managing such transactions. I conclude that there is an efficiency place for public bureaucracy, but that all modes of governance (markets, hybrids, firms, regulation), of which public bureaucracy is one, need to be kept in their place. I further observe that public bureaucracies are not all of a kind and that differences between them need to be distinguished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261404 · Cited by 9,352
Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition
Friedman, M. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226264189.001.0001 · Cited by 8,225
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
The Use of Knowledge in Society
HAYEK, F. (1996) · Knowledge Management and Organisational Design · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749-1.50005-3 · Cited by 6,434
The Theory of Economic Regulation
Stigler, G. J. (2021) · The Political Economy · doi:10.4324/9781315495811-8 · Cited by 5,483
Toward a More General Theory of Regulation
Peltzman, S. (1976) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466865 · Cited by 4,729
Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure
Hart, O. (1995) · doi:10.1093/0198288816.001.0001 · Cited by 4,672
A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence
Becker, G. S. (1983) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1886017 · Cited by 4,117
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,014
Corporate culture and economic theory
Kreps, D. M. (1990) · Perspectives on Positive Political Economy · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571657.006 · Cited by 2,117
Cited by
Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis
Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116 · Cited by 554
The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance
Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004 · Cited by 448
INTER‐MUNICIPAL COOPERATION AND COSTS: EXPECTATIONS AND EVIDENCE
BEL, G., & WARNER, M. E. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12104 · Cited by 375
Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies
Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2007) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930701417528 · Cited by 306
Carey, S. C., & Mitchell, N. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051915-045433 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Williamson, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 306-342
- ISSN
- 1465-7341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094357075
- Cited by
- 784
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306
- The paper
- Williamson, O. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspectives. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.