Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure
Abstract
This book provides a framework for thinking about economic relationships and institutions such as firms. The basic argument is that in a world of incomplete contracts, institutional arrangements are designed to allocate power among agents. The first part of the book is concerned with the boundaries of the firm. It is argued that traditional approaches such as the neoclassical, principal‐agent, and transaction costs theories cannot by themselves explain firm boundaries. The book describes a theory—the incomplete contracting or property rights approach—based on the idea that power and control matter when contracts are incomplete. If the terms of a transaction can always be renegotiated, the incentives of a party to undertake relationship‐specific investments will depend crucially on the ability to control the use of productive assets when renegotiation takes place. Asset ownership becomes an essential source of power. The theory suggests that firm boundaries are chosen to allocate power optimally among the various parties to a transaction. The foundations of incomplete contracting are also discussed. The remainder of the book applies incomplete contracting ideas to understand the financial structure of closely held and public companies. The analysis illustrates how debt acts as an automatic mechanism to constrain the behaviour of managers or owners of both kinds of companies. In closely held companies, debt can force an entrepreneur to pay out funds to investors rather than to himself. In a public company, ownership is dispersed among small shareholders causing a separation between ownership and control. It is argued that debt and equity choices, capital structure decisions, bankruptcy procedures, corporate governance, and takeovers, play a substantial role in limiting the ability of a (self‐interested) manager to make unprofitable but power‐enhancing decisions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In both the contractual framework of Jensen and Meckling and the residual control rights framework of Grossman, Hart and Moore, the rights of investors are protected, and sometimes even specified, by the legal system.
“In both the contractual framework of Jensen and Meckling, and the residual control rights framework of Grossman, Hart and Moore, the rights of the investors are protected, and sometimes even specified, by the legal system.”
From Investor protection and corporate governance (2000) · cites this paper as Hart (1995)
Cites
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 · Cited by 18,957 · see citing works
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255 · see citing works
An Economist's Perspective on the Theory of the Firm
Hart, O. (1989) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1122818 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250042 · Cited by 18,025 · see citing works
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243 · see citing works
Investor protection and corporate governance
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00065-9 · Cited by 6,848 · see citing works
“Research by Grossman, Hart and Moore, summarized in Hart (1995), makes a further key advance by focusing squarely on investor power relative to the insiders, and distinguishing between the contractual and the residual control rights that investors have.”
BackgroundEconomic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810 · see citing works
The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting
Armstrong, C. S., Guay, W. R., & Weber, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization
Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828043052277 · Cited by 1,430 · see citing works
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00027 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
A Futuristic Research Agenda for the Field of Franchising
Dant, R. P. (2008) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2007.00233.x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Axtell, R. (2018) · Handbook of Computational Economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hescom.2018.05.001 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
What drives the disintegration of the loan origination value chain in the banking business
Scannella, E. (2015) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-02-2014-0017 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hart, O.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hart, Oliver
- ORCID
- Hart, Oliver
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1995-10-05
- OpenAlex
- W1580191282
- Cited by
- 4,672
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 163 · 2013: 180 · 2012: 183
- FWCI
- 297.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- incomplete contracting, firm boundaries, property rights, power allocation, relationship-specific investment, asset ownership, financial structure, debt, closely held corporations, public companies, separation of ownership and control, corporate governance, bankruptcy, corporate acquisition, managerial incentives, agency theory, transaction costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review