Cited by 4,672Corporate Finance and GovernanceLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsEconomic Theory and Institutions

Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure

Hart, Oliver·1995

Abstract

This book provides a framework for thinking about economic relationships and institutions such as firms. The basic argument is that in a world of incomplete contracts, institutional arrangements are designed to allocate power among agents. The first part of the book is concerned with the boundaries of the firm. It is argued that traditional approaches such as the neoclassical, principal‐agent, and transaction costs theories cannot by themselves explain firm boundaries. The book describes a theory—the incomplete contracting or property rights approach—based on the idea that power and control matter when contracts are incomplete. If the terms of a transaction can always be renegotiated, the incentives of a party to undertake relationship‐specific investments will depend crucially on the ability to control the use of productive assets when renegotiation takes place. Asset ownership becomes an essential source of power. The theory suggests that firm boundaries are chosen to allocate power optimally among the various parties to a transaction. The foundations of incomplete contracting are also discussed. The remainder of the book applies incomplete contracting ideas to understand the financial structure of closely held and public companies. The analysis illustrates how debt acts as an automatic mechanism to constrain the behaviour of managers or owners of both kinds of companies. In closely held companies, debt can force an entrepreneur to pay out funds to investors rather than to himself. In a public company, ownership is dispersed among small shareholders causing a separation between ownership and control. It is argued that debt and equity choices, capital structure decisions, bankruptcy procedures, corporate governance, and takeovers, play a substantial role in limiting the ability of a (self‐interested) manager to make unprofitable but power‐enhancing decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/0198288816.001.0001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both the contractual framework of Jensen and Meckling and the residual control rights framework of Grossman, Hart and Moore, the rights of investors are protected, and sometimes even specified, by the legal system.

    “In both the contractual framework of Jensen and Meckling, and the residual control rights framework of Grossman, Hart and Moore, the rights of the investors are protected, and sometimes even specified, by the legal system.”

    From Investor protection and corporate governance (2000) · cites this paper as Hart (1995)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, O.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hart, Oliver
Published
1995-10-05
OpenAlex
W1580191282
Cited by
4,672
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 163 · 2013: 180 · 2012: 183
FWCI
297.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
incomplete contracting, firm boundaries, property rights, power allocation, relationship-specific investment, asset ownership, financial structure, debt, closely held corporations, public companies, separation of ownership and control, corporate governance, bankruptcy, corporate acquisition, managerial incentives, agency theory, transaction costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review